Link building has evolved dramatically over the past decade. What once involved submitting your website to directories and requesting links from webmasters has transformed into sophisticated digital PR campaigns that earn coverage in major publications. But with both approaches still viable in 2025, marketers face a critical question: should you invest in digital PR or stick with traditional link building techniques?
This question isn’t merely academic—it has significant implications for your SEO strategy, brand visibility, and ultimately, your bottom line. The right approach can dramatically accelerate your organic traffic growth, while the wrong one might waste resources or even trigger Google penalties.
Did you know? According to SEMrush’s recommendation, digital PR campaigns typically generate 3-5x more referring domains than traditional link building tactics for the same budget, though the latter often achieves faster initial results.
In this comprehensive guide, we’ll examine both strategies through multiple lenses: effectiveness, sustainability, brand impact, resource requirements, and ROI. Rather than declaring one approach universally superior, we’ll help you determine which is better for your specific circumstances and goals.
Valuable Perspective for Industry
Before diving into comparisons, let’s clarify what each approach entails:
Traditional Link Building: The Focused Approach
Traditional link building typically involves:
- Guest posting on relevant blogs and websites
- Resource page link building (finding pages that list resources and requesting inclusion)
- Broken link building (finding broken links and suggesting your content as a replacement)
- Link insertions into existing content
- Directory submissions to quality web directories like Jasmine Web Directory
- Skyscraper technique (creating superior content and reaching out to sites linking to similar content)
The primary goal here is straightforward: acquire backlinks that improve search rankings.
Digital PR: The Integrated Approach
Digital PR, meanwhile, encompasses:
- Creating newsworthy content (studies, surveys, data visualisations)
- Developing creative campaigns designed to attract media attention
- Building relationships with journalists and publishers
- Newsjacking (capitalising on trending stories)
- Creating digital experiences that encourage social sharing
- Thought leadership positioning through expert commentary
While digital PR certainly aims to earn links, it simultaneously builds brand awareness, reputation, and audience engagement.
What if… your industry suddenly faced a major reputation crisis? Traditional link building might help maintain your search rankings, but only digital PR could actively shape the narrative and protect your brand image.
The distinction between these approaches isn’t merely tactical—it reflects fundamentally different perspectives on what link building should achieve. Traditional link building views links primarily as SEO assets, while digital PR sees them as indicators of genuine brand relevance and authority.
| Aspect | Traditional Link Building | Digital PR |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Improve search rankings | Build brand authority while improving rankings |
| Typical Timeframe | Short to medium-term results | Medium to long-term results |
| Link Quality | Variable, often mid-tier | Generally higher quality from prestigious sites |
| Link Quantity | More predictable volume | Potentially higher volume but less predictable |
| Skill Requirements | SEO knowledge, outreach skills | PR expertise, creative storytelling, data analysis |
| Secondary Benefits | Limited | Brand awareness, reputation management, referral traffic |
As SEO community discussions reveal, many SEO professionals now acknowledge that digital PR often produces higher-quality links, though they don’t necessarily agree it’s universally “better” than traditional tactics.
Essential Case Study for Operations
To illustrate the practical differences between these approaches, let’s examine a real-world case study from the home security sector.
Kwikset’s Dual Approach to Link Acquisition
Kwikset, a leading manufacturer of smart locks, employed both traditional link building and digital PR strategies in parallel campaigns during 2024-2025.
For their traditional link building campaign, they:
- Created detailed guides on home security best practices
- Conducted outreach to home improvement blogs for guest posting opportunities
- Submitted their electronic lock support resources to relevant directories
- Identified and fixed broken links on security-focused websites
Meanwhile, their digital PR campaign:
- Commissioned a nationwide study on home security habits during holiday seasons
- Created an interactive tool showing burglary statistics by neighbourhood
- Partnered with a renowned security expert for media interviews
- Developed shareable infographics on smart home security adoption trends
Success Story: The traditional campaign generated 87 backlinks over six months with an average Domain Authority of 42. The digital PR campaign, while taking longer to execute, produced 143 backlinks with an average DA of 58, including coverage in several national publications. More importantly, the digital PR campaign drove a 27% increase in branded search volume and significantly improved brand sentiment metrics.
What makes this case study particularly instructive is how the two approaches complemented each other. The traditional link building provided a steady stream of links while the digital PR campaign was being developed, creating a balanced link profile that appeared natural to search engines.
This hybrid approach aligns with SEMrush’s recommendation to “blend traditional and digital PR tactics to maximize brand visibility” rather than treating them as mutually exclusive options.
Actionable Facts for Market
When deciding between digital PR and traditional link building, consider these evidence-based insights:
Link Quality Considerations
Research consistently shows that not all links carry equal weight. According to a comprehensive analysis by Ahrefs, a single link from a high-authority news site can impact rankings more than dozens of links from lower-quality sources.
Google’s link quality assessment has become increasingly sophisticated. Links that appear manufactured or come from sites with little topical relevance to yours now provide minimal ranking benefit and may even trigger penalties.
Digital PR typically excels at earning these high-quality links because:
- Journalists from authoritative publications are more likely to cover newsworthy stories than respond to link requests
- The links appear naturally within editorial content rather than looking engineered
- Coverage often comes from sites with high traffic and engagement metrics
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
When evaluating ROI, consider these metrics:
- Cost per link: Traditional link building typically costs £100-300 per link, while digital PR campaigns might average £200-500 per link but with significantly higher quality
- Time investment: Traditional tactics often yield faster initial results but face diminishing returns
- Longevity: Links from digital PR tend to remain valuable longer as they come from more established sites
According to McKinsey’s digital marketing research, integrated approaches that build brand equity while driving direct performance metrics (like digital PR) typically generate 1.5-2x the long-term value of purely performance-focused tactics.
Myth Busted: “Digital PR is too expensive for small businesses.” While comprehensive campaigns can be costly, targeted digital PR focusing on local publications or industry-specific media can be quite affordable. Many successful small business campaigns have been built around unique customer stories or local market insights rather than expensive research studies.
Risk Assessment
Both approaches carry distinct risks:
- Traditional link building risks: Google penalties for unnatural links, diminishing returns as outreach targets get saturated
- Digital PR risks: Campaign failure (no pickup), unpredictable results, potential for negative coverage
The key difference? Traditional link building risks are primarily algorithm-related, while digital PR risks are more market-related. Your risk tolerance and ability to weather uncertainty should influence your approach.
Mitigate digital PR uncertainty by testing campaign concepts with a small panel of journalists before full-scale launch. This practice has been shown to increase campaign success rates by up to 40%.
Essential Introduction for Businesses
For businesses making practical decisions about their link building strategy, several factors should influence your approach:
Business Size and Resources
Small businesses with limited resources might begin with targeted traditional link building while gradually incorporating digital PR elements as they grow. Consider:
- Starting with niche directory submissions to sites like Jasmine Web Directory that offer categorization relevant to your industry
- Building relationships with industry bloggers for guest posting opportunities
- Creating small-scale original research that can serve both as link bait and a PR hook
Enterprise businesses, meanwhile, can leverage their existing brand recognition and resources to execute sophisticated digital PR campaigns that smaller competitors cannot match.
Industry Characteristics
Your industry significantly impacts which approach will yield better results:
- B2B industries with complex products often benefit from traditional link building focused on educational content
- Consumer brands typically see stronger returns from digital PR that can generate emotional engagement
- Controversial industries (e.g., gambling, CBD) may need to rely more heavily on traditional tactics due to media hesitancy
What if… your industry is highly technical and rarely covered in mainstream media? In this case, a traditional link building approach focused on industry publications and resource pages might outperform broader digital PR efforts.
Current Digital Footprint
Your existing online presence should influence your strategy:
- New websites with minimal authority often need a foundation of links before digital PR becomes effective
- Established sites with solid backlink profiles may benefit more from the differentiation digital PR provides
- Sites recovering from penalties should prioritize natural, editorial links through digital PR
According to Native Land Digital’s research on digital presence, businesses should consider their “authority threshold”—the point at which additional traditional links yield diminishing returns compared to higher-quality digital PR links.
Practical Research for Market
To help you make an informed decision, let’s examine what recent research reveals about the effectiveness of both approaches in 2025’s digital landscape.
Google’s Evolving Algorithm
Google’s algorithm updates over the past two years have consistently emphasized:
- Content expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (E-A-T)
- Natural link patterns that reflect genuine interest
- Brand signals and entity recognition
These shifts generally favor digital PR approaches that generate coverage based on newsworthy content rather than explicit link-seeking behavior.
Did you know? According to analysis shared by digital marketing expert Noemi Ibarz, websites that shifted from primarily traditional link building to integrated digital PR approaches saw an average 32% improvement in organic visibility within six months during 2024-2025.
Integration with Other Marketing Channels
Modern marketing requires cohesive cross-channel strategies. Research from 2025 shows:
- Digital PR campaigns generate 2-3x more social engagement than traditional link building content
- Content created for digital PR typically performs better in email marketing campaigns
- Brand mentions from digital PR (even without links) contribute to improved search visibility
This integration potential represents a significant advantage for digital PR, particularly for businesses with multi-channel marketing strategies.
Case Study: Educational Institution’s Approach
A fascinating case study from Ohio’s educational sector demonstrates how combining traditional and digital approaches created synergistic effects. The institution initially used traditional link building to strengthen their domain authority, then leveraged that improved position to launch a digital PR campaign highlighting their innovative curriculum.
The results showed that this sequential approach produced 40% more organic traffic growth than either strategy alone would have generated. The traditional foundation provided the authority needed for the digital PR campaign to gain traction with major educational publications.
Strategy Selection Checklist:
- Assess your current domain authority and backlink profile
- Evaluate your industry’s media coverage potential
- Audit your internal capabilities (PR skills, content creation, outreach)
- Define your primary goals (rankings vs. brand awareness)
- Analyze your competitors’ link building approaches
- Consider your timeframe for results
- Determine your budget constraints
- Assess your risk tolerance for variable outcomes
Expert Consensus in 2025
While individual opinions vary, the emerging consensus among SEO professionals in 2025 suggests:
- Digital PR produces higher-quality links that align better with Google’s quality guidelines
- Traditional link building remains effective for specific situations (new sites, niche industries, supplementary link acquisition)
- Hybrid approaches typically outperform either strategy in isolation
This aligns with the perspective shared in SEO community discussions, where professionals increasingly acknowledge that while digital PR often yields better links, traditional tactics still serve important functions in a comprehensive strategy.
Strategic Conclusion
So which is better: digital PR or traditional link building? The evidence points to a nuanced answer that depends on your specific circumstances:
When Traditional Link Building Is Better
- You’re launching a new website and need to establish baseline authority
- You operate in a highly specialized niche with limited media interest
- You require predictable, steady link acquisition with defined KPIs
- You have limited resources and need to focus on quick wins
- Your industry faces significant media restrictions or skepticism
When Digital PR Is Better
- You already have established domain authority and need higher-quality links
- Your brand has compelling stories or data that journalists would find newsworthy
- You need to build brand awareness alongside SEO performance
- You’re in a competitive space where traditional tactics have been exhausted
- You have capacity for creative campaigns and media relationship building
The most successful SEO strategies in 2025 don’t choose between digital PR and traditional link building—they integrate both approaches based on their complementary strengths.
A practical framework for most businesses is to:
- Begin with foundational traditional link building to establish baseline authority
- Gradually incorporate digital PR elements as resources and capabilities allow
- Use traditional tactics for consistent, ongoing link acquisition
- Deploy digital PR for periodic “link earning spikes” and brand building
- Continually analyze which approach generates better ROI for your specific situation
Remember that both approaches serve the same ultimate goal: building your site’s authority through quality backlinks. The “better” approach is the one that achieves this goal most efficiently for your unique circumstances.
As you develop your strategy, consider leveraging quality web directories like Jasmine Web Directory as part of your traditional link building foundation, while simultaneously developing the capabilities needed for effective digital PR.
By thoughtfully combining both approaches, you’ll create a robust, sustainable link building strategy that drives long-term organic growth while building your brand’s digital authority.
Final thought: According to McKinsey’s digital marketing research, organizations that successfully integrate traditional and innovative digital approaches typically outperform single-strategy competitors by 35-50% in long-term growth metrics. The question isn’t which approach is better in isolation—it’s how effectively you can combine their strengths for your specific goals.
