One line in this Miami injury practice's results does not belong with the others: a business litigation entry sits among the spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, amputations, and wrongful death cases. That pairing is the first genuinely unusual thing about Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney, and it changes how the rest of the page should be read. Michael Redondo founded the firm, known as Redondo Law, in 2019, and almost everything on the Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney page is built to be measured by what the firm has recovered.

The recoveries are the heart of the Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney presentation, so they deserve most of the scrutiny. A $43 million verdict in a catastrophic case involving a drunk driver sits near the top of the page, and below it run settlements from $450,000 to $2.5 million. The spread is the useful part. It tells a researcher the firm handles both ordinary auto claims and the severe end of the docket, and the figures are tied to case types instead of collapsed into a single lump of millions recovered. Specificity of that kind is worth more than a round total, because a prospective client can see the shape of the work rather than an aggregate number that could cover anything.

The honest limit is that none of these numbers can be checked from the outside. The $43 million headline is a single case, not a track record, and a verdict that size says nothing about whether it repeats. The settlement range may describe typical results or the best ones pulled forward for display; the page gives no way to tell which, and that is true of every firm that publishes case results. So the figures are good for understanding what the practice reaches for, and poor for predicting any individual outcome. The most defensible way to use them is as a description of ambition, with the $43 million treated as a ceiling and the $450,000 to $2.5 million band closer to the working zone for a serious crash.

The same outcome-first instinct explains the contingency arrangement at Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney. No fee unless the firm wins is standard for plaintiff-side injury work, so its presence here is expected and not a distinguishing feature, but it answers the practical question first. For the catastrophic cases the firm emphasizes, where medical bills and lost income can pile up long before any settlement lands, that structure is often the only realistic path to representation. The flip side is built into the model: contingency firms choose their cases, and a practice that foregrounds large verdicts may weigh smaller or harder claims differently. The site does not say so, and reading intent into marketing would be unfair. It is simply how these economics work.

The supporting structure of Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney is solid. Practice areas cover car, truck, and motorcycle accidents at the core, plus slip and fall, premises liability, product liability, and boating accidents, the last of which fits a coastal market where on-water collisions are a real category of harm. Coverage is named across South, Central, and North Florida, with Texas listed too, and specific mentions of Coconut Grove, Coral Gables, Doral, Hialeah, and West Palm Beach. The site carries individual pages for each practice area instead of one combined list, a testimonials page, and a team section, and the per-area writing reads as the work of someone who handles enough of each type to have something particular to say about a boating claim versus a truck claim.

Credentials and reputation

On verifiable credentials, Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney does the basics correctly. Michael Redondo appears in the Florida Bar directory as an active member, profile number 86550, which an injured client can confirm without taking the firm's word for anything. Many attorney sites omit the bar number entirely, so its presence on the page is a point in the firm's favor. The 2019 founding date is stated plainly, so the firm's age is not left to guesswork.

Outside opinion is uneven across platforms. Facebook lists an 84 percent recommendation rate, but it rests on only five reviews, far too few to mean much. Birdeye holds a far larger pool at 158 reviews, a substantial count for a practice this young, though the actual rating was not visible in what could be gathered, so the volume is informative while the sentiment behind it is not. A Yelp listing exists as well. For a prospective client, the Birdeye pool is the one place where there is enough material to learn something before contact, and reading it directly would tell more than the headline figures do.

Reaching Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney is straightforward. The phone number and a Coral Way address with a suite number sit on the homepage, and a consultation request form handles written inquiries. There is no public email address, which is normal for attorney sites where the form and phone cover the same ground. A street address and a physical Miami office do more for trust than any tagline, especially for clients who want to sit across a desk from the person handling their case.

The verdict

The character of Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney comes from a single named founder, a confirmable bar credential, and a results page detailed enough to read critically. For a Miami resident after a serious crash, a fall, or a boating incident, Miami Accident & Personal Injury Attorney publishes enough that a consultation can be entered with eyes open, and the $43 million figure, the 158 Birdeye reviews, and the Florida Bar profile each give an independent thing to check first.

The doubt that stays unresolved is the one the page itself put there at the start. The same name and the same practice handle both personal injury and business litigation, so a client is engaging a generalist litigator with an injury emphasis, not a dedicated catastrophic-injury specialist. For most car accidents or slip-and-fall claims that split attention will not change the outcome. For an unusually complex catastrophic case, the kind the $43 million verdict was meant to advertise, it is a fair concern, and the firm built around a founder still in his practice's first decade has not yet shown that the headline result is anything it can do twice.

---