Muscle & Fitness

Muscle & Fitness is an American bodybuilding and fitness magazine, published only online and run out of Chandler, Arizona by JW Media, LLC. Joe Weider founded it in 1935, making it one of the oldest fitness titles still going, and the site keeps the shape of the print magazine it grew out of: named verticals for Workouts, Nutrition, Athletes & Celebrities, Features, Anti-Aging, Wellness, Flex, and Hers, a homepage built around a hero story and an editorial grid, plus recipes, podcasts, and exercise video hubs linked from the footer.

The print run lasted more than eighty years, first under Weider Publications and then American Media, before the presses stopped in 2020 and the brand went digital only. The company announced the change itself, under a headline calling Muscle & Fitness a fitness media giant, and the back catalogue survived the move. An Archives section keeps older material reachable, and the footer still advertises an RSS feed.

Ownership deserves its own paragraph. The footer names JW Media, LLC, the Jake Wood company, as the parent of Muscle & Fitness, and that same company runs the Mr. Olympia and the Olympia Fitness & Performance Weekend, with a Buy Olympia Tickets link next to the legal pages. So when Muscle & Fitness reports on the Olympia, it is covering an event its own parent owns and sells admission to. Nothing here is hidden, but it belongs in how the contest coverage reads.

Training, nutrition, and the other verticals

Workouts is the core vertical, split into Workout Routines and Workout Tips, and the category front is a photo-led grid that turns over steadily. Recent entries include a piece on rugby player Junior Nsemba's preferred exercises and one built around the cable push-pull rotation, a core movement walked through step by step in the photography. The Routines and Tips split sounds minor until a lifter needs a full session and keeps landing on general advice instead, and Muscle & Fitness keeps this material away from the celebrity and lifestyle verticals, so a reader hunting a program is not wading through profiles to find one.

Nutrition follows the same tiered structure: Healthy Eating, Lose Fat, Gain Mass, Supplements, and Performance Nutrition, with a separate Recipes section holding the food content and its own photo grid. Filing advice by goal helps in a field where a cutting diet and a mass-gain diet contradict each other on purpose, so a reader chasing one goal is not handed the other's advice by mistake. A newsletter promises workout routines and recipes, with separate mailing lists for Muscle & Fitness, Hers, and FLEX. The Supplements sub-section needs the standard caution: this is an enthusiast bodybuilding publication, and its supplement writing reads as guidance rather than clinical advice.

The exercise video library

The most tool-like corner of Muscle & Fitness is the exercise video library, searchable and organized by body part: abs and core, arms, back, chest, legs, shoulders. That structure turns it into a reference, and it mirrors how lifters plan a session, so the navigation matches the way people use the material. Someone mid-program can pull up a body part, watch a demonstration, and get back to training, and because the library is linked straight from the footer, it is reachable without touching the editorial stream at all. Paired with Workout Routines, it covers what to do and how to do it.

Flex, Hers, and anti-aging

Flex continues the FLEX bodybuilding brand as its own vertical, home to Mr. Olympia contest coverage, pro athlete news, and competition-focused training features. Muscle & Fitness Hers runs alongside it as a full vertical for women's training and athletes, with its own celebrity coverage and mailing list. The Anti-Aging vertical is the least expected of the group, with sub-sections for Functional Medicine, Hormone Optimization, and Recovery next to broader longevity and wellness coverage. Hormone optimization sits on contested medical ground, and the same skepticism a reader brings to the supplement section belongs here too.

The Athletes & Celebrities and Features verticals round out the mix, and the front-page spread is wide: a World Cup soccer feature, a Patrick Mahomes piece, a podcast interview where bodybuilder Melvin Anthony breaks down posing technique. Muscle & Fitness publishes at a steady pace, its feed carrying twenty-five items, each with photography attached, when sampled, and the brand keeps active accounts on Facebook, X, Instagram, and YouTube.

A Sitejabber listing rates Muscle & Fitness around 3.5 out of 5, but that rests on exactly two reviews, too small a sample to draw a conclusion from, and no Trustpilot record turned up for the domain. For a magazine, that gap counts for less than it would for a retailer taking payment and shipping product, since there is no transaction to go sideways. A reader ends up judging Muscle & Fitness mostly by its content, since outside ratings contribute close to nothing here.

Contact is functional but slightly buried. The contact page is a form routing messages to advertising, editorial, or guest post inboxes, covering the realistic reasons a reader would write in. The company's street address in Chandler appears in the privacy policy and terms of use, so it exists on the site but takes digging to find, and no phone number appears anywhere on Muscle & Fitness itself.

The verdict splits along a clean line. As a free training and nutrition read, Muscle & Fitness is a strong resource: the verticals go deep, the exercise library is a genuinely useful reference, and the recipes and newsletters extend the core material. Nine decades of bodybuilding coverage sit behind it in the Archives, and lifters, coaches, and anyone following the competitive bodybuilding scene will find steady, specific material here.

The reservations are structural. The parent company owns the biggest contest Muscle & Fitness covers and sells tickets to it from the site footer; hormone and supplement content comes from inside an industry that has products to sell; and the two-review Sitejabber record means readers have to supply their own judgment. Treated as a specialist magazine with deep roots and an open point of view, the site is easy to recommend. Treated as a neutral health authority, it is no such thing, and it never quite claims to be.

---

---