Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS

Most cosmetic surgery sites hide the surgeon behind aspirational photography and vague assurances. The site for Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS does the opposite. The practice address at 1301 20th St. in Santa Monica and a direct phone number are on the homepage, and the site names an in-office accredited operating room staffed by board-certified anesthesiologists as the venue for surgery. That is a specific claim a patient can verify, and it is more transparency than comparable practice sites tend to offer.

Procedure range from breast surgery to facelifts

The procedure range is broad for a solo-name practice. Breast work gets the heaviest coverage: augmentation, lift, reduction, revision, correction of implant problems, and transgender top surgery. The revision and implant-problem pages are worth noting separately, because practices that openly court those cases are taking on patients who were unhappy elsewhere, which requires a different kind of clinical confidence than simply doing first-time augmentations. Body procedures cover liposuction, tummy tuck, the mommy makeover combination, body lifts after significant weight loss, and a "menopause makeover" framing that is not common phrasing on comparable surgeon sites. Facial work includes facelift, neck lift, eyelift, rhinoplasty, brow lift, chin augmentation, and otoplasty. Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS also lists a men's section covering gynecomastia, facelift, liposuction, and tummy tuck, plus non-surgical Botox for patients who want a less involved option.

Practice locations along the coastal strip

The geographic footprint on the site names Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Marina Del Rey, Manhattan Beach, Malibu, and Pacific Palisades. That is a tight, affluent coastal strip, and it reads as an accurate description of where the patient base comes from rather than a bid to rank for every city in Southern California.

Ratings across seven review platforms

The third-party review picture for Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS is unusually consistent. Real Patient Ratings puts the practice at 4.7 across more than two thousand ratings, with a stated 94.2 percent satisfaction figure. RealSelf shows 4.9 across 429 reviews, Google 4.6 across 97, Healthgrades 4.5 across 153, RateMDs 4.3, Zwivel 4.4 across 53, Yelp 155 reviews, and Facebook a clean 5.0 across 40. When a surgeon lands in the mid-to-high fours on six or seven independent platforms, that pattern is considerably harder to explain away than a single perfect score on one site.

Self-hosted ratings page and platform comparison

Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS aggregates these scores on its own ratings page, which is a transparent choice. A self-hosted summary is still curated by the office, so the raw platform pages are the ones to weight most. Here they happen to back the in-house figures rather than contradict them, which is not always the case when a practice does this.

Photo galleries and video testimonials

A business directory listing points to the homepage, and beyond the ratings that homepage offers before-and-after photo galleries, patient video testimonials, and educational pages walking through each procedure. For elective cosmetic work, photographs are more persuasive evidence than written claims because they are harder to fabricate wholesale and allow a prospective patient to assess aesthetic outcomes directly from published material. Video testimonials require patients to appear on camera, which is a higher bar than a text quote, and the practice clears it.

Does surgical volume affect outcomes

The credential and reputation evidence is strong. What a website cannot answer is the question that ultimately drives a cosmetic surgery decision: whether the surgeon's aesthetic judgment aligns with what a specific patient wants for their own face or body. The galleries hint at a stylistic sensibility and the reviews speak to bedside manner, but neither substitutes for the in-person consultation. Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS covers a wide procedure range, which is genuinely useful for patients comparing options. A careful reader might still want to ask during that consultation how frequently Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS personally performs the specific operation they are considering, since experience in one area does not automatically transfer to another. Volume in rhinoplasty and volume in body lifts are separate things.

The practice's overall transparency record

The published record for Steven Teitelbaum, MD FACS is solid across multiple independent sources. The ratings count is high enough to be statistically meaningful, the procedure documentation is detailed, the photographic evidence is present, and the accredited in-office surgical suite is a verifiable credential that separates this practice from those that rely on hospital privileges and offer no comparable transparency. A patient who has done that much research before walking in is starting from a more informed position than one who found the practice through a single-site review with a handful of ratings. No online profile closes the gap between documentation and individual surgical outcome, but the profile here gives a prospective patient considerably more to evaluate before walking through the door.