Two attorneys with roughly fifty years of combined practice between them have chosen to spend it on something most large firms ignore: the errors buried in a credit report and the collectors who will not stop calling. Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. is a consumer protection law firm in Reston, Virginia, and the narrowness of that focus is deliberate. A. Hugo Blankingship III and Thomas B. Christiano are not generalists who take a credit case when one walks through the door. The Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the federal statutes built around them are the work itself, not a sideline.

That specialization comes through in how the practice areas are laid out. The site covers credit report errors and disputes, identity theft resolution, employment background check inaccuracies, tenant screening report disputes, false criminal records surfacing in background checks, and security clearance problems that trace back to credit reporting mistakes. Debt collection harassment sits alongside all of it. A wrong criminal record on a tenant screening report and a security clearance threatened by a phantom debt are different legal problems governed by different statutes, and Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. treats them as distinct cases worth their own pages, not variations on a single theme.

The security clearance angle is the most telling detail on the site. A firm only writes about that niche if clients have actually come to them with it. Plenty of people in the Virginia and D.C. corridor hold clearances, and a credit error that puts one at risk is a genuine emergency. Naming it specifically points to real casework that someone walked in with. The same logic applies to employment background checks and tenant screening reports, two areas where a single inaccurate line can cost someone a job or an apartment, and where the consumer often has no idea the law provides a remedy at all. Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. explains the remedy on the page instead of making a prospective client dig for it.

How the cases get paid for

One feature of this kind of practice deserves spelling out, because it changes who can realistically afford a lawyer. The federal consumer protection statutes Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. relies on are fee-shifting laws: when a consumer wins, the defendant can be ordered to pay the consumer's legal fees. The firm takes these cases on contingency under that framework, which means a person harmed by a credit reporting error does not need a retainer check to get representation. For someone already dealing with damaged credit, that structure is often the difference between pursuing a claim and walking away from it.

The site also states plainly that Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. is willing to litigate rather than settle for a token amount. That is a meaningful posture in this corner of law, where the easy path is accepting whatever a credit bureau offers to make a dispute go away. A firm prepared to go to court carries more negotiating power when it sits down with opposing counsel, and clients tend to benefit from that even when the matter never reaches a courtroom. Whether any individual case justifies that stance is always a judgment call, but stating it up front sets a clear tone about how Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. approaches the work.

Geographically, the reach is wider than a single Reston office might suggest. Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. lists clients across more than a dozen Virginia localities, Washington D.C., and the Pittsburgh area of Pennsylvania. The Pittsburgh footprint is a little unexpected for a Northern Virginia practice, and the site does not over-explain it, which is probably the right call. It simply names the places it serves.

Outside reputation

The professional record behind Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. is stronger than what a typical small-firm listing turns up. Blankingship himself carries an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the top tier of that peer review system, and Christiano holds a 5.0 out of 5.0 peer entry there. Martindale notes at least three reviews scoring 4.0 or higher. Super Lawyers lists the firm, with Blankingship selected to both the Virginia and D.C. rosters, a recognition that comes from peer nomination and independent evaluation. Birdeye shows eight reviews with a positive tone, though no aggregate number appears in the snippet.

There is no large pile of Google or Yelp ratings to lean on. The picture rests mostly on professional peer assessment, and the assessment of Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. is strong. For this particular area of law, where clients are often managing private financial trouble, a modest public review count is unsurprising. The peer ratings from Martindale-Hubbell and Super Lawyers are independent, and they tell a prospective client more about the firm than a star count would. Someone who wants dozens of consumer reviews to scroll through will not find them, but the credentials that do exist come from other lawyers, not from anything the firm could pay to arrange.

The site itself gives a prospective client real material to read. Contact information, a blog, attorney profile pages, success stories, and client testimonials all appear. There is both a general inquiry form and a separate free credit review intake form for someone who wants the firm to look at their situation before deciding anything. None of it feels padded.

Set against a national outfit like Lexington Law, which markets credit repair as a subscription service across all fifty states, Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. is a different proposition entirely. Lexington Law is a high-volume credit repair operation that cannot file a federal lawsuit on a client's behalf the way licensed attorneys can. Someone with a genuine FCRA or FDCPA claim and a connection to Virginia, D.C., or western Pennsylvania is better served by lawyers who will actually sue when the facts warrant it. The fee-shifting structure means bringing that claim costs nothing up front. Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. makes a specific and coherent case for itself within its service area, and the peer recognition behind the firm backs it up. Outside that area, or for someone seeking general credit-score coaching, Blankingship & Christiano, P.C. is simply not the right fit, but the firm is transparent enough about its scope that no one should be confused about what they are getting.

---