Jack H. Pogosian founded In Motion Law, APC in San Diego's Rancho Bernardo district as an employment practice, then built out from there into personal injury and business law. He holds the title of CEO and trial counsel, so the firm is, in practice, built around one named attorney who handles cases through verdict if needed. Serving both employees and employers in the same practice is the firm's defining structural choice: In Motion Law takes on discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, whistleblower protection, wrongful termination, unpaid overtime, unpaid wages, EEOC complaints, and PAGA enforcement on the employee side, while also defending companies facing those exact same claims. California employment firms almost always pick one side and plant a flag there. In Motion Law did not, and the site makes no attempt to soften that.

Employment practice serving both sides

Personal injury is the second column, concentrated on road accidents: car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian collisions. Business law rounds out the three-part offering, aimed at companies from startup to established, covering general counsel retainers, transactional work, contract disputes, partnership conflicts, and commercial litigation. The practical shape of that combination means a founder could bring In Motion Law in on early contracts, land in a partnership dispute three years later, and use the same firm throughout without rebuilding the relationship from scratch. Geographic reach for In Motion Law runs from San Diego to Los Angeles and statewide across California, which is relevant for PAGA and employment claims that exist entirely within California's statutory framework.

Personal injury and business law

The website is organized with more care than many small-firm sites manage. Each practice area gets a dedicated page, so someone with an overtime claim and someone with a bicycle injury reach different intake paths and not a shared catch-all screen. Pogosian has his own profile page, and in a firm where one named attorney holds the role of both CEO and trial counsel, that biography is the most useful single thing the site offers. Some practices at this size skip the attorney bio entirely; having one here gives a prospective client something concrete to cross-check against the State Bar record. That check costs nothing and takes about two minutes.

Website organization and attorney profile

There is a testimonials page with client statements. A firm curates its own testimonials by definition, so they sit somewhere between a reference check and promotional copy. Worth skimming quickly; not something to base a decision on by themselves.

Phone and a street address in Rancho Bernardo are both published openly. That combination removes a layer of uncertainty that digital-only or form-only listings leave in place. No direct email appears on the site, only a contact form, which is common enough at this firm size and routes an inquiry the same way email does. The contact setup for In Motion Law is unambiguous, and San Diego-area clients have a physical address to attach to the name and to visit if needed.

Searching for third-party ratings tied to inmotionlaw.com returned nothing on Google, Avvo, Yelp, or the BBB. A clarification worth making: "Law In Motion," "Motion Law Immigration," and "Attorneys in Motion" each appear in those searches as entirely separate firms, and none of those entries connect to In Motion Law. A referral-driven practice of this size can operate for years without accumulating public ratings, particularly when clients do not voluntarily post about employment disputes or personal injury settlements. That is not a damning finding by itself.

What it does mean is that the curated testimonials on the firm's own site have no external check, and a prospective client cannot quickly see how outcomes have landed for others. For an employment matter or a commercial dispute, that absence shifts more of the verification work onto the client at the outset. The honest summary: In Motion Law presents a coherent scope, a named trial attorney with a public profile, and a dual-sided employment stance that most California firms explicitly avoid. The contact details are clear and the geographic reach covers the full state.

Verify credentials through state bar records

The practical due-diligence path from here is straightforward. Confirm Pogosian's California State Bar standing and check his discipline history on the Bar's public site. Ask for references at any initial meeting. Read the engagement agreement with attention to fee structure, costs advanced, and how case-handling decisions get made. Call In Motion Law's office, outline the situation, and see how the intake conversation goes. None of those steps is unusual for any law firm; they simply carry more weight when no independent review record exists to offer a second opinion.