Bracker & Marcus LLC operates as a whistleblower law firm specializing exclusively in False Claims Act (FCA) and qui tam litigation. Founded in 2015 by Julie Bracker and Jason Marcus, the firm represents individuals who expose fraud against the government—whether that involves healthcare billing schemes, defense contractor misconduct, or financial fraud. Based in Atlanta with additional offices in Kansas City and Washington D.C., they handle cases nationwide.

The False Claims Act allows private citizens, called relators, to file lawsuits on behalf of the government when they witness fraud involving federal funds. Successful whistleblowers can receive between 15% and 30% of whatever the government recovers. It's a powerful legal tool, but also a complicated one. These cases often remain sealed for years while the Department of Justice investigates, and the legal landscape shifts constantly. In my opinion, having attorneys who focus entirely on this niche makes a real difference when navigating such complex terrain.

What sets this firm apart is its singular focus. Many law firms dabble in qui tam work alongside other practice areas, but Bracker & Marcus dedicates all their professional time to False Claims Act matters. Legal analytics firm Lex Machina ranked them as the fourth most active qui tam plaintiff's firm in the country based on cases filed between 2016 and 2020—trailing only a handful of larger, longer-established firms. The firm reports achieving twice the national average rate of government interventions, which matters because government-backed cases typically result in larger recoveries.

The attorneys here personally handle every case rather than farming work out to junior associates after the initial consultation. Julie Bracker brings nearly two decades of FCA experience, having closed over 30 cases and recovered more than $80 million for taxpayers before co-founding this firm. She serves as a frequent speaker at whistleblower law conferences and has chaired national FCA forums. Jason Marcus complements her expertise with strong litigation skills and has been recognized for his work on cases ranging from small medical practices to large mortgage lenders.

Case results on their website show settlements spanning multiple industries. A $320 million recovery against Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. addressed falsified borrower eligibility data for government-backed loans. Universal Health Services settled for $117 million over allegations of fraudulent psychiatric hospital billing. A $24 million settlement involved New York home care agencies employing untrained health aides. The firm has also handled smaller cases—something not every FCA practice will do—because they believe fraud at any scale deserves attention.

Declined cases represent another area where this firm differs from competitors. When the government chooses not to intervene in a qui tam lawsuit, many attorneys walk away. Bracker & Marcus evaluates whether proceeding independently makes sense and will litigate declined cases when the evidence supports it. They bring in co-counsel when needed to match resources against well-funded defense teams, at no extra cost to the client. Some of the largest FCA recoveries have actually come from cases the government initially passed on.

The firm handles retaliation claims alongside fraud allegations. Whistleblowers often face workplace consequences for reporting misconduct—demotions, harassment, or termination. Both partners hold active memberships in the National Employment Lawyers Association, and Julie Bracker previously served as president of its Georgia chapter. This dual expertise means clients dealing with both fraud exposure and job retaliation can get help on both fronts from the same legal team.

Contingency fee arrangements mean clients pay nothing upfront. The firm advances court costs and legal expenses throughout what can be a multi-year process. Fees come out of any eventual recovery, so whistleblowers can pursue cases without financial risk. Free confidential consultations allow potential clients to discuss their situation before committing. As a reviewer looking at client testimonials, the recurring themes are responsiveness, honest assessments, and genuine investment in the ethical concerns that motivated whistleblowers to come forward in the first place.

---