Both attorneys behind Hunt Law hold an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the top peer-reviewed mark a lawyer can carry, and that detail sets the tone for everything else on this site. Clifford J. Hunt and Nancy Hunt run a small Florida practice out of Seminole that does work most general firms never touch: securities law for companies that raise capital and report to the SEC. The official entity is the Law Office of Clifford J. Hunt, P.A., trading as Hunt Law, and it leans hard into one specialty rather than spreading across whatever a business might need.

The substance is in the kind of filings the firm handles. Public and private securities offerings sit at the center, including SEC Regulation D placements and registration statements on Forms S-1, S-3 and S-8, plus Form 10 registrations. Beyond getting a company registered, there is the ongoing machinery of staying public: periodic SEC filings, ownership and insider reports, and the compliance burden that smaller reporting companies carry year after year. Blue Sky work, meaning state-by-state securities registration and exemption filings, rounds out the offering side.

Where Hunt Law gets genuinely specialized is the corporate-event work. The firm advises on mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and reverse mergers, the last of which is a route private companies use to go public without a conventional offering. It also writes SEC Rule 144 opinion letters and handles the removal of restrictive legends from stock, a narrow but concrete headache for anyone holding restricted shares who wants to sell them. Add FINRA and exchange corporate-action filings to that list and the picture is a firm built for the technical plumbing of capital markets, not consumer legal needs.

Clifford Hunt brings more than 35 years of experience to that work, and his background explains the focus. Before this practice he worked at a St. Petersburg law firm and served as Assistant Corporate Counsel at Raymond James Financial in the late 1980s. Time spent inside a major brokerage and investment bank is exactly the grounding you would want from a lawyer drafting offering documents and reading regulatory tea leaves. It is a credible path into this corner of the law, and it shows in the range of matters Hunt Law takes on.

The client list described tells you who this is for: private and public companies, corporate officers, boards of directors and CEOs, with particular attention to smaller reporting company compliance. Hunt Law says it serves clients nationally and internationally, which fits a securities practice, since SEC and FINRA rules are federal and the work travels regardless of where the company sits. A startup founder weighing a Regulation D raise, a small public company buried in periodic filings, or a shareholder stuck with a legend on restricted stock would all find a relevant contact here.

On reaching Hunt Law, the details are where you expect them. A phone number and the Seminole Boulevard street address are both posted on the site, and there is a separate contact form page for anyone who would rather write than call. Nothing about getting in touch requires hunting around, which still counts when the alternative is a practice that hides behind a single web form.

Reputation picture

The AV ratings for both attorneys are genuine peer assessments, the kind that reflect how other lawyers and judges rate ability and ethics over years of practice. They have standing inside the profession even without any client reviews to back them up. What is missing is a body of public client feedback: no Google, Yelp or BBB reviews surfaced for this specific firm. There is a Glassdoor page with employee complaints, but that belongs to a similarly named litigation firm in another state, a personal-injury practice at a different web address, so it has no bearing on the securities work reviewed here. Worth keeping straight, because the names are close enough to mislead a quick search.

The absence of client reviews is not damning for a practice like this. Securities and corporate clients are companies and executives, not the sort who leave star ratings, and confidentiality runs deep in this field. Still, a prospective client cannot lean on crowd-sourced testimony and has to weigh Hunt Law on its credentials and stated experience instead. For a specialty this technical, that trade is reasonable, though it does put more of the burden on an initial conversation to confirm fit.

The narrow focus is the honest strength here. A two-attorney shop concentrating on securities and business law for reporting companies is doing something most firms cannot, and the depth of filing types listed backs that up. The flip side is scale: this is a boutique, so anyone needing a large bench for litigation or unrelated matters would look elsewhere. For its intended work, the offering is deep rather than wide.

If you run a smaller public or pre-public company in Florida or beyond and need counsel who lives in SEC forms, Rule 144 opinions and Blue Sky compliance, Hunt Law is a sensible call. Phone the Seminole office, mention the specific filing or transaction you are facing, and ask directly how the firm has handled that exact situation before. The published record is enough to justify the conversation; whether the fit holds is something only that exchange can settle.

---