{"id":29402,"date":"2026-09-08T06:49:40","date_gmt":"2026-09-08T11:49:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?p=29402"},"modified":"2026-09-08T06:49:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-08T11:49:40","slug":"directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner’s guide for 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal directories the previous year, spent close to nineteen thousand dollars in listing fees alone, and could not point to a single client who had hired the firm because of any of it. When she pressed her intake coordinator, he said most new clients mentioned Google, a referral, or “I saw you somewhere online”. Useful.<\/p>\n

I asked to see the listings. They were what you would expect: the firm name, a stock headshot of the founding partner, three sentences of generic copy that could have described any family lawyer in Arizona, and a phone number that rolled to voicemail after 5pm. The Avvo profile had two reviews, both from 2019. The Martindale profile listed a paralegal who had left in 2022.<\/p>\n

This is the state of legal directory marketing in late 2025, and it is why I have spent the last eighteen months developing a framework I call TIER. The acronym is convenient; the discipline behind it is not. Before I introduce it, though, you need to understand why most directory strategies for law firms quietly fail.<\/p>\n

Why traditional directory strategies fail law firms<\/h2>\n

The “list everywhere” fallacy and its hidden costs<\/h3>\n

The dominant advice for the last decade has been: get your firm onto as many directories as possible. Consistency matters, citations matter, NAP (name, address, phone) signals matter. All true, up to a point. But “list everywhere” treats every directory as roughly equivalent SEO juice, and that is wrong in a way that costs real money.<\/p>\n

Each premium listing is a recurring expense, often between $300 and $1,500 a month depending on the directory and the practice area. Multiply that across ten directories and you are spending six figures a year on what is, for many firms, undifferentiated background noise. Worse, each profile demands maintenance: photos, hours, attorney bios, case results, review responses. Neglect them and you are paying for a listing that actively damages credibility.<\/p>\n

I have audited firms paying for Lawyers.com profiles that still listed disbarred associates. Whoever sold them that listing did not care, and the firm did not have the capacity to police it.<\/p>\n

Why generic SEO advice breaks down for legal practice<\/h3>\n

Most directory optimisation guides, including the otherwise sensible 2026 Birdeye guide<\/a>, are written for restaurants, dentists, plumbers, home services. The advice assumes you can publish before-and-after photos, run promotions, post limited-time offers, and solicit reviews aggressively.<\/p>\n

None of that maps cleanly to law. State bar advertising rules in California, New York, Texas, and Florida (among others) restrict testimonials, prohibit certain comparative claims, require disclaimers on case results, and in some jurisdictions forbid solicitation language that would be perfectly normal for a roofer. The generic “respond to every review within 24 hours” advice ignores that responding to a negative review can, if done carelessly, breach client confidentiality under Model Rule 1.6 and its state analogues.<\/p>\n

The 2024-2025 shift that changed directory economics<\/h3>\n

Two things changed in the last eighteen months that most firm marketers have not absorbed. First, Google’s local pack composition shifted: directory-driven citation signals matter less for ranking than they did in 2020, while review velocity and Google Business Profile completeness matter more. Second, generative AI search results have started pulling structured data directly from legal directories. Rankings.io noted that Justia, Avvo, and FindLaw now provide authoritative signals<\/a> not just for traditional search engines but for AI systems that depend on structured legal data.<\/p>\n

That second point matters more than the first. When someone asks ChatGPT or Google’s AI Overview “best family lawyer in Phoenix for high-conflict custody”, the answer is increasingly assembled from directory data: attorney specialisations, jurisdictions, peer endorsements, review patterns. Firms with thin or inconsistent directory presence are, quite literally, filtered out of the answer set before a human ever sees the question.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> Avvo receives roughly 2 million client visits per month, and during the most recent measurement period tracked by PaperStreet using Compete.com data, its month-to-month traffic grew 62 percent. Martindale grew 26 percent and Lawyers.com 18 percent in the same window.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Introducing the TIER framework<\/h2>\n

Targeting, intent, evidence, retention defined<\/h3>\n

TIER stands for Targeting, Intent, Evidence, Retention. Each word names a discipline, not a checklist item.<\/p>\n

Targeting is the work of choosing which directories deserve your firm’s presence and budget, based on jurisdiction, practice area, and the searcher populations each directory actually attracts. Intent is the work of building profiles that match the decision stage of the people who will read them: a curious browser needs different copy from a person who has already been served with divorce papers. Evidence is the accumulation and orchestration of social proof across listings, coordinating reviews, case results, peer endorsements, and bar honours rather than scattering them. Retention is the ongoing maintenance discipline that prevents listings from rotting, plus the attribution work that tells you which listings are actually earning their keep.<\/p>\n

What this framework replaces and why<\/h3>\n

TIER replaces the “list everywhere, update annually, hope for the best” model that still dominates law firm marketing. It also replaces the equally common “Avvo is the only directory that matters” reductionism, which made sense in 2014 and is now wrong because the AI-driven discovery layer pulls from multiple structured sources.<\/p>\n

I want to be honest: TIER is not novel science. It is the codification of habits I have watched the best law firm marketers practise informally for years. What it adds is sequence and measurement, so that a managing partner can ask “where are we on Evidence for the immigration practice?” and get a real answer.<\/p>\n

Mapping TIER to a firm’s practice areas<\/h3>\n

The framework runs once per practice area, not once per firm. A firm with both estate planning and personal injury practices needs two TIER passes, because the directories, the searcher intent, and the evidence rules differ sharply between those areas. Estate planning clients tend to research quietly over weeks; personal injury clients are often making contact within hours of an incident. Same firm, completely different directory strategy.<\/p>\n

Component one: targeting directory selection<\/h2>\n

Jurisdictional authority versus national reach<\/h3>\n

The first targeting decision is whether the practice area is jurisdiction-bound (most of them) or genuinely national (some appellate work, federal tax, immigration). For jurisdiction-bound practices, the state bar’s lawyer referral service and the county bar’s directory often outperform national directories on conversion, even though they get a fraction of the traffic. The reason is intent: someone searching the Maricopa County Bar referral service has already decided they need a lawyer and they want one in Phoenix. That visitor converts at three to five times the rate of a generalist Avvo browser, in my experience.<\/p>\n

\n
\r\nsankey-beta\r\n  Directory budget,Avvo Pro,18000\r\n  Directory budget,Super Lawyers PI,24000\r\n  Directory budget,Justia Premium,9600\r\n  Directory budget,Maricopa Bar LRS,1800\r\n  Directory budget,FindLaw and reserve,36600\r\n  Avvo Pro,Lead pool,22\r\n  Super Lawyers PI,Lead pool,19\r\n  Justia Premium,Lead pool,14\r\n  Maricopa Bar LRS,Lead pool,28\r\n<\/pre>
Figure 1.<\/strong> How a Phoenix personal injury firm’s $90,000 annual directory budget splits across listings, with the $1,800 Maricopa County Bar referral service projected to win the largest single share of leads.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
The trap is that the state and county bar directories are often ugly, hard to use, and offer poor analytics. Marketers ignore them because they cannot measure them. That is bad reasoning. Measure with intake call tracking and dedicated phone numbers, then make the comparison.<\/p>\n
Practice-specific versus general legal directories<\/h3>\n
General legal directories like FindLaw and Lawyers.com cast wide nets. Practice-specific directories (the National Trial Lawyers, the American Immigration Lawyers Association directory, Super Lawyers’ practice-area subsets) cast narrow ones. The narrow nets usually win on conversion, but the wide nets help with the AI discovery layer I mentioned earlier, because they feed structured data to systems that synthesise answers.<\/p>\n
You want both, weighted toward narrow. A reasonable starting allocation for a mid-sized firm is sixty percent of directory budget on practice-specific and jurisdiction-specific listings, thirty percent on the two or three general legal directories with strong AI ingestion, and ten percent reserved for experimentation. Reserved budgets matter. Without them, you never test anything new.<\/p>\n
Worked example: a personal injury firm in Phoenix<\/h3>\n
Consider a four-attorney personal injury firm in Phoenix with a $90,000 annual directory budget. The TIER-driven targeting allocation I would recommend looks like this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Directory<\/th>\nType<\/th>\nAnnual cost<\/th>\nPrimary value<\/th>\nExpected lead share<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Avvo Pro<\/td>\nGeneral legal<\/td>\n$18,000<\/td>\nAI ingestion, brand presence<\/td>\n22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maricopa County Bar LRS<\/td>\nJurisdictional<\/td>\n$1,800<\/td>\nHigh-intent local leads<\/td>\n28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Super Lawyers (PI)<\/td>\nPractice-specific<\/td>\n$24,000<\/td>\nPeer credibility, AI signals<\/td>\n19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Justia Premium<\/td>\nGeneral legal<\/td>\n$9,600<\/td>\nSchema-rich profile, backlinks<\/td>\n14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
The remaining roughly $36,000 covers FindLaw, the National Trial Lawyers directory, a Google Business Profile management retainer (technically not a directory but operationally part of the same discipline), and the reserved experimentation budget. Notice that the cheapest line item, the county bar referral service at $1,800, is projected to produce the largest single share of leads. That is targeting working as intended.<\/p>\n
Component two: intent-matched profile construction<\/h2>\n
Aligning copy with searcher decision stage<\/h3>\n
I have read hundreds of attorney directory profiles, and the most common failure is writing as if every visitor is at the same stage. They are not. On Avvo, a visitor is often browsing, comparing, vetting. On a county bar referral service, the visitor has already committed to hiring someone. On a niche directory like the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, the visitor may be another attorney looking for a co-counsel referral. Same firm, three different audiences, three different profiles.<\/p>\n
\n
\r\njourney\r\n  title Matching profile copy to searcher decision stage\r\n  section Awareness\r\n    Browsing Avvo profiles: 2: Client\r\n    Comparing firms: 3: Client\r\n  section Consideration\r\n    Reads case results: 4: Client\r\n    Checks bar honours: 4: Client\r\n  section Decision\r\n    Visits county bar LRS: 5: Client\r\n    Reviews intake process: 5: Client\r\n  section Referral\r\n    Peer seeks co-counsel: 4: Attorney\r\n<\/pre>
Figure 2.<\/strong> The same firm faces three or four different audiences across directories; intent-matched copy meets a browser, a committed hirer, and a referring attorney where each actually stands.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
The fix is to write the profile copy by mapping the directory’s typical visitor to a decision stage (awareness, consideration, decision, referral), then choosing language and proof points accordingly. A consideration-stage profile leads with case results and bar honours. A decision-stage profile leads with availability, intake process, and what to expect in the first call. A referral-stage profile leads with peer credentials and unusual case experience.<\/p>\n
Schema markup and citation consistency checks<\/h3>\n
Citation consistency is the boring half of intent matching. Your firm name, address, and phone number must be identical across every listing, down to whether you write “Suite 400” or “Ste. 400”. Web Directory<\/a> makes the point bluntly: search engines treat consistency across multiple respected directories as a trust signal, and businesses with inconsistent or missing listings rank lower in local results. That holds for legal as much as for anything else.<\/p>\n
For schema, the LegalService schema type is more useful than the generic LocalBusiness type, but most directories will not let you control schema directly; they generate it from the fields you fill in. The practical implication: fill in every field, including the ones that seem irrelevant, because the schema generation often pulls from fields the user-facing profile does not even display.<\/p>\n
\n
Quick tip:<\/strong> Build a single canonical “firm fact sheet” document with the exact name, address, phone, hours, attorney bios, bar admissions, and practice area descriptions. Every directory listing copies from this sheet, never from another listing. This kills citation drift before it starts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Photo, video, and case result placement rules<\/h3>\n
Photos sell more strongly than copy in any directory I have measured. Real photos, not stock. The firm’s actual office, the actual attorneys, the actual conference room where clients sit. Generic stock photography of gavels and law books reads, to a 2026 audience, as a sign that the firm could not be bothered.<\/p>\n
Video is overrated in directory contexts. I know that contradicts what most agencies say. In practice, video on directory profiles gets low completion rates and rarely changes conversion. Spend the production budget on better photography and a tighter written profile instead.<\/p>\n
Case results require care. State bar rules vary on what you can publish and with what disclaimers. New Jersey, for example, requires specific language about the limits of past results predicting future outcomes. Florida is similarly strict. Build your case-result snippets with the most restrictive jurisdiction’s rules in mind, then reuse the same snippets everywhere, because using different language in different jurisdictions creates compliance risk and looks evasive.<\/p>\n
\n
Myth:<\/strong> More photos and longer profiles always perform better. Reality:<\/strong> Above roughly six photos and 400 words of profile copy, additional content has diminishing returns and can hurt by burying the call-to-action. I have seen profile shortening increase contact rates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Component three: evidence stacking across listings<\/h2>\n
Review velocity targets by practice area<\/h3>\n
Evidence is where most firms either over-invest or under-invest, rarely getting it right. The principle that matters is velocity, not volume. A profile with forty reviews all dated within a two-month window in 2022 looks suspicious and performs worse than a profile with twelve reviews distributed across the last three years.<\/p>\n
Sensible velocity targets vary by practice area. For high-volume practices (personal injury, immigration, criminal defence), aim for two to four new reviews per attorney per month. For lower-volume practices (estate planning, business formation, family law), one to two per attorney per month is realistic and looks natural. For appellate or specialised litigation, even six reviews per year may be plenty; clients in those areas often expect to find few reviews and weight them heavily when they exist.<\/p>\n
Cross-directory signal reinforcement<\/h3>\n
Reviews on one directory do not feed reviews on another, but the patterns reinforce each other in the eyes of both human readers and AI ingestion. If a prospective client checks three directories and sees consistent themes (“responsive”, “explained things clearly”, “fought hard in mediation”), the cumulative effect is stronger than any single profile.<\/p>\n
This means you should not chase reviews on only one platform. Spread the ask. After a successful matter, the intake coordinator should mention “we appreciate reviews on Google, Avvo, or our Maricopa Bar listing, whichever is easiest for you”, and rotate which one is mentioned first. Avoid scripting the language clients use; it is ethically dubious, and scripted reviews are easy to spot and increasingly easy for platforms to detect algorithmically.<\/p>\n
Handling negative reviews under bar advertising rules<\/h3>\n
This is the section that should be longer than it is in most guides, because the rules genuinely constrain what you can do. Model Rule 1.6 prohibits revealing information relating to the representation of a client without informed consent. Several state ethics opinions (including New York State Bar Opinion 1032 and California Formal Opinion 2018-216) have applied this to online reviews: you cannot respond to a negative review by disclosing case facts to defend yourself, even if the reviewer disclosed them first.<\/p>\n
The defensible response template I use is short and reveals nothing: acknowledge the reviewer’s frustration, state that the firm cannot discuss matters publicly due to confidentiality obligations, and offer to discuss the concern directly. That is it. No “actually, we won the case” rebuttals. No “this person was never a client” denials, even if true, because that itself can be a disclosure.<\/p>\n
\n
Did you know?<\/strong> The Consultants and Consulting Organizations Directory tracked by Gale Research lists more than 26,000 firms and individuals across 14 general fields of consulting activity, a reminder that professional directories have been operating at scale for decades; the legal directory ecosystem is younger but structurally similar.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Component four: retention and listing maintenance<\/h2>\n
Quarterly audit cadence and triggers<\/h3>\n
Listings rot. Attorneys leave, phone systems change, office addresses move, bar admissions expand, case results become outdated. A quarterly audit is the minimum cadence I will accept from a firm that takes directory strategy seriously. Twice a year is what most firms actually manage. Once a year is negligence.<\/p>\n
The audit covers contact information accuracy across every listing, attorney roster accuracy, photo currency (replace any photo older than three years), bar admission listings, practice area descriptions, case result currency, and review response status. I keep a spreadsheet with every listing as a row and every check as a column. Boring; effective.<\/p>\n
Some events force an out-of-cycle audit: any attorney departure or arrival, any office move, any phone number change, any rebrand, any disciplinary matter (the firm’s response to a public bar complaint should be coordinated across listings, with counsel from an ethics specialist).<\/p>\n
When to prune underperforming listings<\/h3>\n
The hardest discipline in retention is killing listings. Firms hold on to underperforming directory subscriptions out of inertia and a vague fear that cancelling will hurt SEO. In my experience, cancelling a paid listing while keeping a free basic profile rarely hurts measurable rankings, and the savings often exceed the lost lead value within two months.<\/p>\n
My pruning rule: if a paid listing has produced fewer than three signed clients over the last twelve months, and the math on those clients does not cover the annual fee with at least a 3x return, drop to free or cancel. Reallocate to listings that are working or to the experimentation reserve.<\/p>\n
\n
Myth:<\/strong> Cancelling a paid directory listing will tank your local SEO. Reality:<\/strong> Most paid features are visibility and lead-gen enhancements, not ranking signals. The underlying citation usually remains via the free profile, which is what matters for SEO.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Tracking attribution beyond last-click<\/h3>\n
Last-click attribution makes directories look worse than they are, because directory visits often happen mid-funnel: someone hears your name from a friend, checks your Avvo profile to vet you, then Googles your firm name and clicks the website. The website gets credit; the directory gets nothing. This is wrong but it is the default in most analytics setups.<\/p>\n
Better attribution comes from intake-based questioning (“where did you first hear about us” plus “where did you check us out before calling”), unique phone numbers per listing where the listing supports it, and UTM parameters on every directory profile link back to the website. None of this is perfect. The intake question alone, asked consistently, will give you better attribution than any technical setup.<\/p>\n
Walkthrough: a midsize family law practice<\/h2>\n
Baseline audit and TIER scoring<\/h3>\n
Let me walk through a real engagement, anonymised. A nine-attorney family law firm in a Midwestern metropolitan area, three offices across two counties, came to me in early 2024. Annual directory spend was about $74,000, attributable revenue from directories (by their last-click measurement) was about $61,000. They were, on paper, losing money on directories.<\/p>\n
\n
\r\ngantt\r\n  title 90-day TIER implementation for the family law firm\r\n  dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD\r\n  section Targeting\r\n    Targeting audit and drops   :a1, 2024-01-01, 15d\r\n    Add county bar LRS          :a2, after a1, 5d\r\n  section Intent\r\n    Rewrite profiles by intent  :b1, after a1, 30d\r\n    Citation consistency sweep  :b2, after b1, 10d\r\n  section Evidence\r\n    Review velocity programme   :c1, after b2, 30d\r\n    Negative review protocol    :c2, after c1, 10d\r\n  section Retention\r\n    Attribution setup           :d1, after c1, 15d\r\n    First quarterly audit       :d2, after d1, 10d\r\n<\/pre>
Figure 3.<\/strong> The phased 90-day rollout for the nine-attorney family law firm, sequencing targeting drops into intent rewrites, then evidence stacking, then retention infrastructure.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
The baseline TIER audit produced scores on a 1-5 scale per component. Targeting scored a 2: they were paying for FindLaw, Lawyers.com, Avvo Pro, Super Lawyers, and three smaller directories, with no apparent rationale for the mix. Intent scored a 2: every profile used identical copy, written for a general audience. Evidence scored a 3: they had a respectable review base but no velocity discipline; reviews clustered around past marketing pushes. Retention scored a 1: the last audit had been twenty-two months earlier, and one attorney listed as active had retired in 2022.<\/p>\n
90-day implementation timeline<\/h3>\n
The 90-day plan looked like this (see Figure 2 for the sequence).<\/p>\n
Days 1-15: targeting. We cancelled Lawyers.com and one of the smaller directories, redirected that roughly $14,000 annual spend to the two relevant county bar referral services and a paid listing on the state family law specialist directory. We also added a basic firm profile in Jasmine Directory<\/a> to widen the citation footprint into a non-legal-specific directory, which helps with general business search and AI ingestion.<\/p>\n
Days 16-45: intent and evidence preparation. We wrote three distinct profile copy sets (consideration, decision, referral), commissioned new photography across all three offices, and ran a citation consistency sweep that found seventeen inconsistencies in suite numbers, phone formats, and attorney spellings. All fixed.<\/p>\n
Days 46-75: evidence stacking. We trained intake staff on the review-request script, set up a post-matter follow-up sequence that nudged satisfied clients toward Google, Avvo, or the county bar listing on a rotation, and built the negative-review response protocol with the firm’s ethics counsel signing off on the templates.<\/p>\n
Days 76-90: retention infrastructure. UTM parameters on every link, unique tracking numbers where supported, intake questionnaire updated, and the first formal quarterly audit scheduled.<\/p>\n
Results, course corrections, and what surprised us<\/h3>\n
By month nine, attributable revenue from directories had risen to roughly $138,000 against an annual spend of about $71,000 (slightly lower than baseline because of the cancellations). The county bar referral services, which had cost almost nothing, produced more signed clients than Avvo Pro did. That was the biggest single surprise, although in retrospect it should not have been.<\/p>\n
The course correction came around month six: Super Lawyers, which I had expected to be a strong performer, produced fewer than the Justia listing despite costing roughly three times as much. We did not cancel Super Lawyers because the peer credibility value showed up in referral conversations even when it did not show up in direct lead attribution, but we negotiated the renewal down significantly.<\/p>\n
The other surprise was negative, and worth saying out loud: the review velocity programme produced a brief spike of mediocre reviews about two months in, because the intake team was asking everyone uniformly rather than selectively. We retrained: ask after positive outcomes, not after every matter. Volume dropped, average rating recovered, conversion improved.<\/p>\n
\n
What if…<\/strong> your firm operates in a jurisdiction where the state bar has just issued new restrictions on online testimonials, mid-implementation? This happened to a Pennsylvania firm I worked with in 2023. The answer is: pause the review velocity programme, audit existing reviews against the new rule (most rules apply prospectively but some require remediation), and pivot evidence stacking toward case results, bar honours, and peer endorsements until the rule’s interpretation stabilises. Do not try to be clever. The disciplinary downside is asymmetric.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Edge cases and honest limitations<\/h2>\n
Solo practitioners with limited budgets<\/h3>\n
TIER assumes a firm with at least one person whose job includes directory maintenance. Solo practitioners often do not have that. For a true solo on a tight budget, the framework simplifies dramatically: pick one general legal directory (Avvo or Justia, free tier), one jurisdictional directory (state or county bar referral), and Google Business Profile. That is it. Spend the saved money on Google Business Profile optimisation and review velocity, because those compound faster for solos than directory spend does.<\/p>\n
I would rather a solo practitioner have three excellent listings than ten mediocre ones. The framework still applies; you are just running it at smaller scale, and Retention becomes the binding constraint because the solo is doing the maintenance themselves between client matters.<\/p>\n
Multi-state firms and conflicting bar rules<\/h3>\n
Firms with offices in multiple states face genuinely difficult choices when bar advertising rules conflict. A firm with offices in California and Texas, for example, must satisfy both California’s strict testimonial rules and Texas’s particular requirements around firm-name advertising. The path I recommend is to identify the most restrictive rule across all jurisdictions and apply it universally. This costs you some marketing flexibility in the more permissive jurisdictions but eliminates the risk of an out-of-state regulator finding a violation.<\/p>\n
The framework’s Targeting component should explicitly account for jurisdictional mix. A firm with one dominant state office and a small satellite might tier its directory strategy primarily around the dominant state’s rules. A firm with genuinely balanced offices in multiple states needs to invest in jurisdiction-specific listings in each, which raises the total directory budget meaningfully.<\/p>\n
Where TIER does not apply: niche appellate work<\/h3>\n
I said earlier I would name a place where TIER does not apply, so here it is. Niche appellate practices, particularly federal appellate and supreme court work, do not benefit much from directory marketing. Their clients are almost exclusively other lawyers making referrals, and those referrals happen through bar association activity, conference visibility, scholarly publication, and personal reputation. A Supreme Court advocate does not need an Avvo profile. A Supreme Court advocate needs a track record visible in legal scholarship and an active presence in the appellate bar.<\/p>\n
The same is broadly true for white-shoe corporate transactional work at the top end (M&A above a billion dollars, complex cross-border tax). Directory listings are not how that work moves; relationships and league tables are. TIER assumes a practice where some meaningful fraction of clients discover the firm through search and directory channels. When that fraction is near zero, run a different playbook entirely.<\/p>\n
\n
Did you know?<\/strong> The Library of Congress maintains a large collection of uncataloged directories that are indexed but not searchable through standard catalogues, suggesting that even institutional directory resources extend beyond what most researchers and marketers ever see.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
What to do on Monday morning<\/h2>\n
If you are a marketing director or managing partner reading this with a directory budget you cannot fully account for, here is the concrete first step. Pull every directory invoice from the last twelve months. Put them in a spreadsheet. Next to each one, write the number of signed clients the firm can confidently attribute to that listing, using whatever attribution method you have. If you cannot answer that question for any line item, that listing is your first audit candidate, not the most expensive one.<\/p>\n
\n
\r\ngraph LR\r\n  A[Pull directory invoices] --> B[Count signed clients per listing]\r\n  B --> C{Attributable in 12 months?}\r\n  C -->|No| D[First audit candidate]\r\n  C -->|Yes 3x return| E[Keep or scale]\r\n  C -->|Under 3 clients| F[Drop to free or cancel]\r\n  F --> G[Reallocate to reserve]\r\n<\/pre>
Figure 4.<\/strong> The Monday-morning pruning logic: a paid listing with fewer than three signed clients in twelve months, or one that fails a 3x return, drops to free while the savings flow to the experimentation reserve.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
Then ask intake to add one question to every new client conversation for the next sixty days: “Before you called us, did you check us out anywhere online?” Tally the answers. You will likely find that the directories you assumed mattered are not the ones clients mention, and that one or two listings you nearly cancelled are doing real work.<\/p>\n
That data, gathered over sixty days, becomes the Targeting input for your first proper TIER pass. The framework starts working the moment you have honest data about where clients actually come from, and most firms have never gathered that data at the granularity TIER requires. Start there. The rest of the framework is patient; your existing directory spend is not.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal directories the previous year, spent close to nineteen thousand dollars in listing fees alone, and could not point to a single client who had hired the firm because of any […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29401,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[737],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29402","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-directories"],"yoast_head":"\nDirectory listings for law firms: a practitioner's guide for 2026<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner's guide for 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jasmine Business Directory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-08T11:49:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"714\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gombos Atila Robert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\"},\"headline\":\"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner’s guide for 2026\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-08T11:49:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4285,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Directories\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner's guide for 2026\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-08T11:49:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":714,\"caption\":\"Attorney typing on laptop at wooden desk with legal documents and highlighter, city skyline visible through windows, representing digital directory management for law firms.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner’s guide for 2026\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\",\"alternateName\":\"Jasmine Directory\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/jasminedir\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.com\\\/jasminedir\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crunchbase.com\\\/organization\\\/jasmine-directory\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\",\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1788473731\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1788473731\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1788473731\",\"caption\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\"},\"description\":\"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atilagombos.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/robert.gombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/jasmine.directory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/robertgombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner's guide for 2026","description":"A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner's guide for 2026","og_description":"A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/","og_site_name":"Jasmine Business Directory","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","article_published_time":"2026-09-08T11:49:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":714,"url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Gombos Atila Robert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jasminedir","twitter_site":"@jasminedir","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Gombos Atila Robert","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486"},"headline":"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner’s guide for 2026","datePublished":"2026-09-08T11:49:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/"},"wordCount":4285,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png","articleSection":["Directories"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/","name":"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner's guide for 2026","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png","datePublished":"2026-09-08T11:49:40+00:00","description":"A managing partner at a six-attorney family law firm in Tucson called me last spring, furious. She had paid for premium placement on four legal","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/attorney-laptop-legal-documents-urban-office-workspace-modern.png","width":1280,"height":714,"caption":"Attorney typing on laptop at wooden desk with legal documents and highlighter, city skyline visible through windows, representing digital directory management for law firms."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/directory-listings-for-law-firms-a-practitioners-guide-for-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Directory listings for law firms: a practitioner’s guide for 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","name":"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Jasmine Business Directory","alternateName":"Jasmine Directory","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Jasmine Business Directory"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/x.com\/jasminedir","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/jasminedir\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory","https:\/\/www.crunchbase.com\/organization\/jasmine-directory"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486","name":"Gombos Atila Robert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1788473731","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1788473731","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1788473731","caption":"Gombos Atila Robert"},"description":"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.","sameAs":["https:\/\/atilagombos.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jasmine.directory\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/robertgombos\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29402"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29402\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}