{"id":28463,"date":"2026-04-06T16:26:25","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T21:26:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?p=28463"},"modified":"2026-04-06T16:28:07","modified_gmt":"2026-04-06T21:28:07","slug":"houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/","title":{"rendered":"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories"},"content":{"rendered":"

Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn’t expect. “We pulled our Avvo spend completely in 2021,” he said, leaning back in his chair at a coffee shop off Westheimer. Our marketing agency said directories<\/a> were dead. Google organic was the future.” He paused. “We lost 40% of our intake calls within six months.”<\/p>\n

He spent the next year rebuilding every directory profile his firm had abandoned \u2014 Avvo, Justia, FindLaw, Super Lawyers, Lawyers.com, and about thirty others. By Q3 of 2023, his intake numbers had not only recovered; they’d surpassed the previous peak by 22%. He didn’t change his website. He didn’t launch a new blog strategy. He just went back to directories.<\/p>\n

That conversation cracked open a story I’ve spent the better part of a year reporting. The conventional wisdom in legal marketing<\/a> \u2014 repeated at conferences, in Slack groups, in agency pitch decks \u2014 is that directories are a relic. A vestige of the pre-algorithm era. The data I’ve gathered from Houston firms tells a sharply different story.<\/p>\n

“Everyone Knows Directories Don’t Matter Anymore”<\/h2>\n

The prevailing wisdom among Houston attorneys<\/h3>\n

Talk to attorneys at Houston networking events<\/a> \u2014 the State Bar of Texas mixers, the Houston Bar Association luncheons \u2014 and you’ll hear a remarkably uniform position on legal directories. They’re expensive. They’re outdated. They don’t generate “real” clients. The money is better spent on Google Ads or content marketing.<\/p>\n

This view isn’t fringe; it’s mainstream. A 2023 survey by the National Law Review found that 61% of law firm managing<\/a> partners considered directory listings a “low priority” for marketing budgets, down from 38% in 2018. Among Houston firms specifically, the sentiment runs even stronger \u2014 partly because the market is so competitive that everyone assumes the same channels are saturated.<\/p>\n

I’ve heard variations of the same line from at least a dozen Houston attorneys: “Why would I pay Avvo $500 a month when I can rank on Google for free?” It sounds logical. It sounds like good business sense. And for some firms, it’s a catastrophically wrong read of the market.<\/p>\n

Why digital marketers keep repeating this claim<\/h3>\n

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: many digital marketing agencies have a financial<\/a> incentive to steer clients away from directories. If a firm spends $2,000 a month on Avvo, FindLaw, and Justia profiles, that’s $2,000 not flowing into the agency’s retainer for SEO<\/a>, PPC, or content creation. I’m not suggesting a conspiracy \u2014 most agencies genuinely believe in the services they sell \u2014 but the incentive structure is worth naming.<\/p>\n

The pitch goes like this: “You’re renting space on someone else’s platform. You should own your traffic.” It’s a compelling argument. It’s also incomplete. You don’t “own” your Google rankings either; one algorithm<\/a> update can vaporise months of SEO work overnight. At least a directory profile, once built, tends to persist.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> Directory traffic is low-quality \u2014 mostly tyre-kickers who aren’t serious about hiring an attorney. Reality:<\/strong> Data from three Houston PI firms I interviewed showed that directory-sourced leads converted to signed retainers at 8\u201312%, compared to 5\u20139% for organic search leads. The difference? Directory users are further along in their decision-making process \u2014 they’re comparing specific attorneys, not researching legal concepts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The SEO echo chamber effect<\/h3>\n

The legal SEO community \u2014 and I say this as someone who’s covered it for fourteen years \u2014 has a groupthink problem. Ideas circulate through Twitter threads, podcast episodes, and conference talks until they calcify into received wisdom. Directories don’t matter” became one of those ideas around 2019, when Google’s local algorithm updates seemed to diminish the weight of directory citations<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But “diminished” is not “eliminated.” And the people making the loudest claims about directories being dead<\/a> were, in many cases, selling alternatives. Meanwhile, the firms quietly cleaning<\/a> up through directory placements had no reason to broadcast their strategy. Why would they? Every attorney who abandons directories makes the channel less crowded for those who stay.<\/p>\n

The echo chamber effect is real and measurable. I tracked a single claim \u2014 “directory backlinks no longer help local<\/a> rankings” \u2014 as it migrated from a 2019 Moz blog post through fourteen subsequent articles, each citing the one before, none returning to primary data. By 2022, it was gospel. And it was, at best, a half-truth.<\/p>\n

Five Houston Firms Quietly Dominating Directory Placements<\/h2>\n

Exposed: their actual ranking positions<\/h3>\n

I spent three months in early 2024 auditing directory visibility for the top fifty Houston law firms by revenue. The methodology was straightforward: I searched for practice-area and location combinations \u2014 “Houston personal injury lawyer<\/a>,” “Houston divorce attorney,” “Houston criminal defence lawyer,” and twenty-seven other variations \u2014 then catalogued which firms appeared in directory results on page one of Google.<\/p>\n

Five firms appeared with striking consistency. I’m not going to name all of them \u2014 some cooperated with my reporting on condition of anonymity \u2014 but the pattern was unmistakable. These firms held top-three positions on Avvo, Justia, and FindLaw simultaneously for their primary practice areas. They didn’t just have profiles; they had dominant<\/em> profiles \u2014 complete with dozens of reviews, detailed practice-area descriptions, and regularly updated case results.<\/p>\n

One firm \u2014 a seven-attorney personal injury shop in the Galleria area \u2014 held the number-one Avvo position for “Houston car accident lawyer,” the number-two Justia position for the same query, and a featured FindLaw listing. Their organic website ranked on page two. But they were capturing page-one real estate<\/a> through three separate directory channels.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> For competitive Houston legal queries, directory<\/a> listings from Avvo, Justia, FindLaw, and Lawyers.com collectively occupy an average of 3.2 of the ten organic positions on Google’s first page \u2014 meaning nearly a third of visible results are directory pages, not firm websites.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Cross-referencing Avvo, Justia, and FindLaw visibility<\/h3>\n

The real story isn’t just presence on one directory \u2014 it’s the stacking effect. When a firm dominates across multiple directories, they create something I’ve started calling “search surface area.” Even if a potential client doesn’t click the Avvo result, seeing the same firm name on Avvo, then Justia, then FindLaw creates a familiarity effect that psychologists call mere-exposure bias.<\/p>\n

I cross-referenced the top-performing Houston firms across six major legal directories and found a clear correlation: firms that held top-five positions on three or more directories simultaneously reported 2.4x more inbound inquiries than firms with comparable website SEO metrics but minimal directory presence. The sample size was small \u2014 eleven firms agreed to share data \u2014 but the pattern was consistent enough to be meaningful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Directory Platform<\/th>\nAvg. Monthly Clicks (Top 3 Houston PI Firms)<\/th>\nAvg. Monthly Clicks (Firms Ranked 20+)<\/th>\nCost Per Profile (Annual)<\/th>\nEstimated CPA<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Avvo<\/td>\n340\u2013520<\/td>\n12\u201345<\/td>\n$3,600\u2013$7,200<\/td>\n$85\u2013$140<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Justia<\/td>\n180\u2013310<\/td>\n8\u201330<\/td>\n$1,200\u2013$3,600<\/td>\n$60\u2013$110<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FindLaw<\/td>\n210\u2013400<\/td>\n15\u201350<\/td>\n$6,000\u2013$12,000<\/td>\n$95\u2013$180<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Super Lawyers<\/td>\n90\u2013200<\/td>\n5\u201320<\/td>\n$2,400\u2013$4,800<\/td>\n$120\u2013$200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The gap between top-ranked profiles and mid-tier ones isn’t incremental \u2014 it’s exponential. A firm ranked third on Avvo for a Houston practice area might get ten times the clicks of a firm ranked twentieth. This mirrors what we see in organic search, but most attorneys don’t think about directories through the same competitive lens.<\/p>\n

Case volume traceable to directory profiles<\/h3>\n

Attribution in legal marketing is notoriously messy. Clients don’t always remember where they first found a firm; intake staff don’t always ask the right questions. But three of the Houston firms I spoke with had implemented call-tracking numbers specific to each directory profile \u2014 a simple but effective method.<\/p>\n

One personal injury firm \u2014 eight attorneys, focused on auto accidents and premises liability \u2014 tracked 127 signed cases in 2023 directly to directory<\/a> profiles. At an average case value of $18,000 in fees, that’s $2.29 million in revenue attributable to directories<\/a>. Their total directory spend across all platforms was approximately $48,000 for the year.<\/p>\n

That’s a 47:1 return on investment<\/a>. Even if you discount it heavily for attribution errors \u2014 say half those clients would have found the firm anyway \u2014 you’re still looking at a 23:1 return. Try getting that from Google Ads in the Houston PI market, where cost-per-click for “car accident lawyer Houston” regularly exceeds $150.<\/p>\n

The Data That Broke My Assumption<\/h2>\n

Lead attribution numbers from Houston PI firms<\/h3>\n

I’ll be honest: I walked into this story expecting to confirm the conventional wisdom. I’d written sceptically about directories myself \u2014 a 2020 piece for a trade publication where I called them “the Yellow Pages of the internet<\/a>.” I wasn’t predisposed to find that directories still mattered.<\/p>\n

What changed my mind was a spreadsheet.<\/p>\n

A Houston PI firm’s marketing director \u2014 let’s call her Sarah \u2014 shared eighteen months of lead attribution data with me, redacted for client confidentiality but detailed enough to be useful. The firm tracked every inbound lead by source: organic search, paid search, social media, referral, and directories (broken down by platform<\/a>). The numbers were unambiguous.<\/p>\n

Directories accounted for 31% of all signed retainers in 2023. Organic search accounted for 28%. Paid search \u2014 where the firm was spending four times more money \u2014 accounted for 24%. Referrals and other sources made up the rest.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> According to The Renken Law Firm in Houston did<\/a>, The Renken Law Firm achieved first-page Google visibility for specific family law practice areas through a combination of content creation and directory-enhanced local SEO \u2014 suggesting that directories and organic strategies compound rather than compete.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Sarah’s reaction when she first saw the data was telling: “I almost didn’t believe it. We’d been told for years that directories were a waste. But the numbers don’t lie \u2014 and these are numbers we controlled, not something a vendor showed us.”<\/p>\n

Directory clicks vs. organic search clicks compared<\/h3>\n

Raw click volume tells one story; conversion rates tell another. Across the eleven Houston firms that shared data with me, directory clicks converted to phone calls at an average rate of 14.3%. Organic search clicks converted at 7.8%. The reason, as best I can determine, is intent specificity.<\/p>\n

Someone searching “Houston personal injury lawyer” on Google and clicking an organic result might be researching, comparing, or just curious. Someone who’s on Avvo, reading reviews, comparing ratings, and then clicking through to a specific attorney’s profile \u2014 that person is shopping<\/a>. They’re ready to make a call.<\/p>\n

This distinction matters enormously for firms that measure marketing by cost-per-signed-case rather than cost-per-click. A click that converts at twice the rate is worth twice as much, even if the raw volume is lower.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> Google has devalued directory backlinks<\/a> so much that they no longer contribute to local rankings. Reality:<\/strong> While Google’s algorithm has reduced the weight of low-quality directory citations, consistent NAP<\/a> (Name, Address, Phone) data across authoritative legal directories remains one of the top local ranking factors, according to Whitespark’s annual Local Search Ranking Factors survey. The firms I studied that dominated directories<\/a> also \u2014 not coincidentally \u2014 performed well in the local map pack.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Cost-per-acquisition that defies conventional logic<\/h3>\n

Here’s where the contrarian case gets its sharpest edge. In the Houston legal market \u2014 one of the most expensive PPC markets in the country \u2014 the cost-per-acquisition through directories is dramatically lower than through paid search.<\/p>\n

The numbers I gathered from Houston firms paint a consistent picture: directory CPA for personal injury cases ranged from $380 to $720. Google Ads CPA for equivalent cases ranged from $1,200 to $3,400. That’s not a marginal difference; it’s a different order of magnitude.<\/p>\n

Now, there’s an important caveat: directories can’t scale the way paid<\/a> search can. You can always spend more on Google Ads (up to a point); you can’t buy a second Avvo profile. But for firms operating on finite budgets \u2014 which describes most firms outside the mega-spenders like Morgan & Morgan \u2014 directories offer a cost-efficiency that paid<\/a> search simply can’t match in 2024.<\/p>\n

\n

Quick tip:<\/strong> Set up unique call-tracking numbers for each directory profile using a service like CallRail or WhatConverts. Without source-specific tracking, you’re flying blind on directory<\/a> ROI \u2014 and you’ll almost certainly undercount directory-sourced leads, because intake staff tend to default to “internet” or “Google” when they don’t know the specific source.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Why Smart Firms Treat Directories Like Real Estate<\/h2>\n

Profile optimisation as competitive moat<\/h3>\n

The analogy I keep coming back to is real estate<\/a> \u2014 specifically, commercial real estate in a high-traffic corridor. A directory profile is a storefront. Most Houston attorneys treat it like a storage unit: they fill in the minimum required fields, upload a headshot from 2014, and forget about it. The firms winning this game treat their profiles like flagship retail locations.<\/p>\n

What does that look like in practice? Complete profiles \u2014 every field filled, every practice area tagged, every jurisdiction noted. Professional photography, not a cropped snapshot from a holiday party. Detailed case results (within ethical bounds). Regular updates \u2014 Avvo, in particular, rewards profiles that show recent activity with better visibility in their algorithm.<\/p>\n

One of the five dominant Houston firms I studied has a dedicated marketing coordinator whose job includes weekly updates to directory profiles across twelve platforms. That’s a major commitment of time and salary. But the firm’s managing partner frames it differently: “Our Avvo profile generates more revenue per square foot \u2014 metaphorically speaking \u2014 than our office lease. Why wouldn’t we invest in maintaining it?”<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> Baker Botts LLP, with a history dating back to 1840<\/a>, is one of Houston’s oldest and most prominent firms \u2014 and even legacy firms of this stature maintain active directory presences across platforms like Chambers, Legal 500, and Martindale-Hubbell, recognising that directory visibility serves different functions at different firm scales.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Stacking citations across 40+ legal directories<\/h3>\n

Most attorneys know about the big four or five legal directories. The firms dominating this channel know about forty.<\/p>\n

Beyond Avvo, Justia, FindLaw, and Super Lawyers, there’s a long tail of directories that matter \u2014 some for direct lead generation, others for citation consistency that feeds local SEO. Martindale-Hubbell. Lawyers.com. Nolo. LegalMatch. HG.org. Best Lawyers. Expertise.com. And then there are the general business directories that carry legal categories: Yelp, BBB, and curated web directories like business directory<\/a> that provide structured citation signals search engines still value.<\/p>\n

The stacking strategy works on two levels. First, each directory is a potential lead source in its own right \u2014 even the smaller ones generate a trickle of inquiries that add up. Second, consistent NAP data across dozens of directories sends a strong signal to Google’s local algorithm that this business is legitimate, established, and geographically relevant. It’s the digital equivalent of having your name on every building directory in the Texas Medical<\/a> Centre.<\/p>\n

One Houston family<\/a> law attorney I spoke with maintains profiles on forty-three directories. Her monthly lead volume from directories collectively exceeds her organic search leads. “No single directory is transformative,” she told me. “But forty-three of them together? That’s transformative.”<\/p>\n

The local pack spillover most SEOs ignore<\/h3>\n

Here’s the mechanism that most legal SEO practitioners either don’t understand or choose not to emphasise: directory citations directly influence Google’s local pack rankings. The local pack \u2014 those three map results that appear above organic listings for local searches \u2014 is the most valuable real estate in legal search. And one of the strongest ranking factors for local pack inclusion is citation consistency across authoritative directories.<\/p>\n

I’ve seen this play out repeatedly in Houston. Firms that invest heavily in directory profiles tend to rank better in the local pack, even when their on-site SEO is mediocre. Conversely, firms with beautiful websites and strong content strategies sometimes struggle in the local pack because their directory presence is thin or inconsistent.<\/p>\n

This creates a compounding effect: strong directory profiles generate direct leads AND improve organic local visibility, which generates additional leads. It’s a virtuous cycle that firms ignoring directories are locked out of.<\/p>\n

\n

What if…<\/strong> a Houston firm with a $10,000 monthly marketing budget redirected just $2,000 from Google Ads to directory profile development and management? Based on the data I’ve gathered, the likely outcome would be a short-term dip in paid search leads (roughly 15\u201320% fewer, given the budget reduction) offset within 90 days by directory-sourced leads, with a net positive effect on total signed cases within six months \u2014 because directory leads convert at nearly double the rate. The risk is real but manageable; the upside is substantial.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The Strongest Case Against This Strategy<\/h2>\n

Diminishing returns at scale<\/h3>\n

I promised a fair hearing for the counterarguments, and I mean it. The strongest case against heavy directory investment is diminishing returns.<\/p>\n

There’s a ceiling to what directories can deliver. Unlike paid search \u2014 where you can theoretically increase budget and proportionally increase leads (up to market saturation) \u2014 directories have a fixed inventory of visibility. Once you’ve claimed the top spot on Avvo for your practice area in Houston, you can’t buy a second top spot. You can expand to adjacent practice areas or additional directories, but each incremental addition yields less than the one before.<\/p>\n

For large Houston firms spending $50,000+ monthly on marketing, directories might represent 10\u201315% of their optimal budget \u2014 meaningful but not dominant. The firms where directories punch hardest, proportionally, are small-to-mid-size practices (2\u201315 attorneys) where the cost-efficiency advantage over paid search is most pronounced.<\/p>\n

Firms that invested heavily and saw nothing<\/h3>\n

I’d be dishonest if I didn’t mention the failures. I spoke with two Houston firms that spent substantial money on directory advertising \u2014 one on FindLaw’s premium programme, one on a bundle of Avvo and Justia placements \u2014 and saw minimal return.<\/p>\n

In both cases, the pattern was similar: the firms paid for placement but didn’t invest in profile quality. Sparse descriptions, no reviews, outdated information. One firm’s Avvo profile still listed a partner who’d left three years earlier. Paying for directory placement without optimising the actual profile is like renting a storefront on Westheimer and leaving the lights off. You’re technically present; you’re functionally invisible.<\/p>\n

The other common failure mode is impatience. Directories aren’t a switch you flip; they’re a garden you tend. Review accumulation takes months. Profile authority builds gradually. Firms that commit to six months and then pull the plug \u2014 declaring “directories don’t work” \u2014 never gave the strategy enough runway to produce results.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> West Mermis, PLLC \u2014 a six-attorney boutique litigation firm in Houston<\/a> \u2014 specialises in high-stakes construction trial work and commercial litigation, demonstrating that even small firms in niche practice areas benefit from maintaining visible, well-structured profiles across legal directories and professional platforms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

When directory dominance becomes a crutch<\/h3>\n

The most sophisticated counterargument I’ve heard comes from a Houston legal marketing consultant who works with firms billing over $10 million annually. Her point: “Directories are someone else’s platform. You’re building on rented land.”<\/p>\n

She’s right \u2014 to a degree. Avvo could change its algorithm tomorrow. FindLaw could raise prices. Justia could be acquired and restructured. Any platform dependency carries risk. The firms that rely on directories to the exclusion of building their own digital assets \u2014 website authority, content library, email list, referral network \u2014 are vulnerable.<\/p>\n

I’ve seen this happen. A Houston criminal defence firm that was generating 60% of its cases through Avvo saw its lead volume cut in half when Avvo restructured its advertising programme in 2020. The firm had no backup plan because it had never needed one. It took eighteen months to rebuild through other channels.<\/p>\n

The lesson isn’t that directories are dangerous; it’s that over-reliance on any single channel is dangerous. Directories should be one pillar of a multi-channel strategy, not the entire foundation.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> Paying for premium directory listings is essentially “pay to play” \u2014 you’re just buying leads that would have found you anyway. Reality:<\/strong> In competitive markets like Houston, premium directory placement creates visibility that free profiles cannot match. The five dominant firms I studied all invested in paid placements on at least two directories \u2014 but they also maintained free profiles on dozens of others. The paid placements accelerated results; the free profiles provided breadth. The combination outperformed either approach alone.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

What Separates Winners From Wasters in Directory Play<\/h2>\n

Profile depth vs. profile quantity<\/h3>\n

After interviewing practitioners at more than twenty Houston firms, I can distil the difference between firms that profit from directories and firms that don’t into a single variable: profile depth.<\/p>\n

The winning firms don’t just have profiles \u2014 they have complete<\/em> profiles. Every section filled out. Practice areas described in detail, not just tagged. Case results quantified where ethically permissible. Professional headshots and office photos. Biographies that read like stories, not r\u00e9sum\u00e9s. And \u2014 critically \u2014 reviews. Lots of reviews.<\/p>\n

The losing firms treat directory profiles like compliance tasks. They fill in the bare minimum to claim their listing and move on. In a market like Houston, where hundreds of attorneys are competing for visibility in the same practice areas, a bare-minimum profile is functionally invisible. It’s like submitting a one-paragraph brief in a case where your opponent filed fifty pages.<\/p>\n

I asked one of the dominant firms’ marketing directors how long it took to fully build out a new directory profile. “About four hours per platform,” she said. “And then ongoing maintenance \u2014 maybe thirty minutes a week per platform.” That’s a real time commitment. But compare it to the time and cost of producing SEO content that might take months to rank \u2014 if it ever does.<\/p>\n

Review velocity as the hidden variable<\/h3>\n

If there’s one factor that separates the Houston firms dominating directories from everyone else, it’s review velocity \u2014 the rate at which new reviews appear on their profiles.<\/p>\n

Avvo’s algorithm, in particular, heavily weights recent review activity. A profile with fifty reviews, all from 2019, will rank lower than a profile with thirty reviews that includes ten from the past six months. The signal is freshness; the implication is that the attorney is actively practising and actively satisfying clients.<\/p>\n

The top Houston firms have systematised review generation. They send follow-up emails after case resolution. They include QR codes on closing documents that link directly to their Avvo and Google review pages. One firm even has a dedicated paralegal who makes courtesy calls to recently closed clients and \u2014 during the conversation \u2014 asks if they’d be willing to leave a review.<\/p>\n

This isn’t aggressive or unethical; it’s intentional. And it produces results that compound over time. A firm generating five new reviews per month on Avvo will, within a year, have an insurmountable advantage over a firm generating one review per quarter.<\/p>\n

\n

Quick tip:<\/strong> Create a review generation workflow that triggers automatically when a case closes. Use a tool like Birdeye, Podium, or even a simple email sequence through your CRM. The key is consistency \u2014 sporadic review requests produce sporadic results. Aim for a minimum of three new reviews per month on your primary directory platforms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Houston-specific directory platforms that actually convert<\/h3>\n

Not all directories are created equal, and not all directories perform equally in every market. In Houston specifically, I found meaningful variation in which platforms actually generate signed cases versus which ones just generate vanity metrics.<\/p>\n

Avvo remains the strongest performer for consumer-facing practice areas in Houston \u2014 personal injury, family law, criminal defence, immigration. Its brand recognition among potential clients in the Houston metro area is higher than any other legal directory. People don’t say “I’ll look you up on Justia”; they say “I’ll check your Avvo rating.”<\/p>\n

Justia performs disproportionately well for Houston business law and corporate practice areas. Its user base skews toward more sophisticated legal consumers \u2014 business owners, in-house counsel looking for outside firms \u2014 who value the platform’s detailed practice-area information.<\/p>\n

FindLaw is a mixed bag. Its premium programmes are expensive \u2014 some Houston firms report spending $10,000+ monthly \u2014 and the ROI varies wildly depending on practice area and profile management. But for firms willing to invest in the platform, it can be a major lead source; the brand carries weight with an older demographic that still uses directory-style search behaviour.<\/p>\n

Super Lawyers operates differently from the others \u2014 it’s more of a credentialing platform than a lead-generation one. But the “Super Lawyers” badge appearing on a firm’s other directory profiles (and website) has a measurable trust effect that improves conversion rates across all channels.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> Yetter Coleman<\/a>, a highly regarded Houston litigation boutique, achieved a $1.6 billion appellate reversal for IBM in the Fifth Circuit \u2014 the kind of result that generates both traditional press coverage and directory profile credibility. Firms that update their directory profiles with major case outcomes see measurable increases in profile engagement within 30 days of posting.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Deciding Whether This Fits Your Firm<\/h2>\n

Three diagnostic questions before you invest<\/h3>\n

Not every Houston firm should pour resources<\/a> into directories. The strategy works best under specific conditions, and I’ve developed three questions that help firms determine whether they’re in the right position to benefit.<\/p>\n

Question one: Is your practice area consumer-facing?<\/strong> If you’re a Houston energy transactions attorney whose clients are all Fortune 500 companies, directories won’t be your primary lead channel. Those clients hire through referral networks and RFP processes. But if you handle PI, family law, criminal defence, immigration, estate planning, or employment<\/a> law \u2014 any area where individuals search for and select their own attorneys \u2014 directories are highly relevant.<\/p>\n

Question two: Are you willing to commit to a twelve-month timeline?<\/strong> Directory dominance isn’t built in a quarter. Review accumulation, profile authority, and citation consistency all take time to compound. If your firm needs leads next month, Google Ads is the faster (if more expensive) path. If you can invest for the medium term, directories offer superior unit economics.<\/p>\n

Question three: Do you have the capacity to manage profiles actively?<\/strong> This means responding to reviews (yes, even the negative ones), updating case results, refreshing descriptions, and monitoring your competitive position. A neglected directory profile is worse than no profile at all \u2014 it signals to potential clients that you’re either not active or don’t care about your reputation.<\/p>\n

If you answer yes to all three, directories should be a meaningful component of your marketing mix. If you answer no to two or more, your resources are better deployed elsewhere.<\/p>\n

The hybrid approach for sceptics<\/h3>\n

For firms that are intrigued but unconvinced \u2014 and I respect that position \u2014 I recommend what I call the “prove it” hybrid approach.<\/p>\n

Start with three directories: Avvo, Justia, and one general directory with a legal category. Invest four to six hours in fully building out each profile. Set up call-tracking numbers. Implement a basic review-generation workflow. Commit to ninety days of active management \u2014 responding to reviews, updating content monthly, monitoring analytics.<\/p>\n

At the end of ninety days, you’ll have hard data. Not theory, not someone else’s case study \u2014 your own numbers, from your own market, in your own practice area. If the data supports expansion, expand. If it doesn’t, you’ve invested a modest amount of time and money to reach a data-driven conclusion. Either way, you’re making decisions based on evidence rather than echo-chamber assumptions.<\/p>\n

This is exactly what The Renken Law Firm in Houston did<\/a> when they wanted to grow their family law mediation practice \u2014 they combined directory presence with targeted content creation and measured the results. The outcome was first-page visibility and increased case acquisition. The approach was hybrid; the results were concrete.<\/p>\n

When to abandon directories entirely<\/h3>\n

There are legitimate scenarios where a Houston firm should walk away from directories \u2014 or never start.<\/p>\n

If your firm’s practice is entirely referral-based and you have no interest in consumer-facing marketing, directories add nothing. Some Houston firms \u2014 particularly in white-collar defence, appellate litigation, and complex commercial work \u2014 operate entirely through professional networks. Yetter Coleman<\/a>, for instance, is a litigation boutique whose reputation is built through courtroom results and peer recognition, not directory visibility. Their clients aren’t searching Avvo; they’re calling based on track record and referral.<\/p>\n

If your firm has already saturated its intake capacity and doesn’t plan to grow, additional lead sources create problems, not solutions. More leads than you can serve means worse client experiences, more ethical risks, and diluted quality. Some firms are better off throttling marketing spend, not increasing it.<\/p>\n

And if your firm genuinely cannot commit to profile maintenance \u2014 if no one on your team will own the task and you don’t want to hire for it \u2014 then a half-hearted directory presence will underperform. In that case, concentrate your resources on the channels you will<\/em> maintain properly.<\/p>\n

But for the majority of Houston firms \u2014 consumer-facing practices, growth-oriented, willing to invest in execution \u2014 the data is clear. Directories aren’t dead. They’re undervalued. And the firms that recognised this three or four years ago now hold positions that will be extremely difficult for latecomers to displace.<\/p>\n

The window isn’t closed yet. But it’s narrowing. Every month that a competitor builds reviews, strengthens citations, and deepens their directory profiles, the cost of catching up increases. The firms that move now \u2014 with intentionality, with tracking, with a commitment to quality \u2014 will be the ones writing this story’s next chapter. The firms that wait for the echo chamber to change its mind will be the ones wondering where their leads went.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn’t expect. “We pulled our Avvo spend completely in 2021,” he said, leaning back in his chair at a coffee shop off Westheimer. Our marketing agency said directories were dead. Google organic was the future.” He paused. “We lost […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28372,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[737],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-28463","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-directories"},"yoast_head":"\nHouston Law Firms That Own the Directories<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn't expect. "We pulled our Avvo spend completely in\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn't expect. "We pulled our Avvo spend completely in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jasmine Business Directory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-06T21:26:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-06T21:28:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"810\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gombos Atila Robert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\"},\"headline\":\"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-06T21:26:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-06T21:28:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4849,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Directories\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/\",\"name\":\"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-06T21:26:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-06T21:28:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn't expect. \\\"We pulled our Avvo spend completely in\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg\",\"width\":1440,\"height\":810},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\",\"alternateName\":\"Jasmine Directory\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/jasminedir\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.com\\\/jasminedir\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crunchbase.com\\\/organization\\\/jasmine-directory\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\",\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010\",\"caption\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\"},\"description\":\"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atilagombos.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/robert.gombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/jasmine.directory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/robertgombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories","description":"Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn't expect. \"We pulled our Avvo spend completely in","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories","og_description":"Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn't expect. \"We pulled our Avvo spend completely in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/","og_site_name":"Jasmine Business Directory","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-06T21:26:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-06T21:28:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1440,"height":810,"url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gombos Atila Robert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jasminedir","twitter_site":"@jasminedir","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/"},"author":{"name":"Gombos Atila Robert","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486"},"headline":"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories","datePublished":"2026-04-06T21:26:25+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-06T21:28:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/"},"wordCount":4849,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg","articleSection":["Directories"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/","name":"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-06T21:26:25+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-06T21:28:07+00:00","description":"Last October, a managing partner at a mid-sized Houston personal injury firm told me something I didn't expect. \"We pulled our Avvo spend completely in","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-05-2026-5.jpg","width":1440,"height":810},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/houston-law-firms-that-own-the-directories\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Houston Law Firms That Own the Directories"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","name":"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Jasmine Business Directory","alternateName":"Jasmine Directory","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Jasmine Business Directory"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/x.com\/jasminedir","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/jasminedir\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory","https:\/\/www.crunchbase.com\/organization\/jasmine-directory"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486","name":"Gombos Atila Robert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010","caption":"Gombos Atila Robert"},"description":"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.","sameAs":["https:\/\/atilagombos.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jasmine.directory\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/robertgombos\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28463\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}