{"id":28452,"date":"2026-04-06T16:57:50","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T21:57:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?p=28452"},"modified":"2026-04-06T17:00:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-06T22:00:43","slug":"australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’ve audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served verticals in business directory infrastructure. The problem isn’t a shortage of directories<\/a> \u2014 it’s that existing ones treat a rhinoplasty clinic in Cairns the same way they’d treat a plumber in Campbelltown. That’s not just lazy taxonomy; it actively damages patient trust and practitioner credibility.<\/p>\n

What follows is a framework I’ve developed over three years of working with medical<\/a> and cosmetic surgery practices across five Australian states. I call it the State-by-State Navigation Framework, and it addresses the structural failures I keep encountering in how plastic surgery businesses<\/a> are listed, categorised, and discovered online. If you run a practice \u2014 or you’re building a directory<\/a> that serves this sector \u2014 this is the methodology I’d want you to use.<\/p>\n

The State-by-State Navigation Framework<\/h2>\n

Why alphabetical listings fail practitioners<\/h3>\n

Most general business directories default to alphabetical sorting within a category. This seems logical until you realise what it does to a market like plastic surgery. A practice called “Aesthetic Surgical Arts” will perpetually sit above “Sydney Plastic Surgery Centre” regardless of credentials, patient volume, or geographic relevance. I’ve seen practices literally rename themselves to game alphabetical ordering \u2014 a cosmetic surgeon in Melbourne once asked me whether “A1 Aesthetics” would be a viable rebrand. (I talked him out of it, barely.)<\/p>\n

Alphabetical ordering creates three specific problems for plastic surgery directories<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Problem<\/th>\nEffect on Practitioner<\/th>\nEffect on Patient<\/th>\nPrevalence in AU Directories<\/th>\nFramework Solution<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Name-gaming<\/td>\nPressure to adopt non-descriptive names<\/td>\nCannot infer specialty from listing name<\/td>\nHigh (estimated 40%+ of general directories<\/a>)<\/td>\nSubspecialty-first sorting<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Geographic blindness<\/td>\nMetro practices drown out regional<\/a> ones<\/td>\nIrrelevant results for non-metro searches<\/td>\nVery high<\/td>\nState \u2192 region \u2192 suburb hierarchy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Credential flattening<\/td>\nFRACS surgeons listed alongside GP cosmetic providers<\/td>\nNo way to distinguish training<\/a> levels<\/td>\nNear-universal<\/td>\nCredentialing tier badges<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Stale data persistence<\/td>\nRetired or relocated practitioners still listed<\/td>\nDead-end inquiries erode trust in directory<\/a><\/td>\nModerate to high<\/td>\nQuarterly verification cadence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Procedure ambiguity<\/td>\nBroad “plastic surgery” label obscures specialisation<\/td>\nPatient must visit each site to determine fit<\/td>\nVery high<\/td>\nMulti-tag procedure taxonomy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The framework replaces alphabetical ordering with a multi-axis sorting system: state first, then credentialing tier, then subspecialty, then proximity. This mirrors how patients actually search \u2014 they don’t look for “A” surgeons; they look for a breast reconstruction specialist in Brisbane who holds FRACS credentials.<\/p>\n

How geographic density distorts visibility<\/h3>\n

Australia’s plastic surgery market is absurdly concentrated. My best estimate, based on ASPS member directories and AHPRA registration data, is that roughly 65\u201370% of specialist plastic surgeons practise in the Sydney\u2013Melbourne\u2013Brisbane corridor. This creates a visibility problem that general directories make worse: when you search for “plastic surgeon” on most platforms, you get a wall of Sydney results before a single Adelaide or Hobart listing appears.<\/p>\n

The distortion isn’t just annoying \u2014 it has real consequences. Regional patients default to metro surgeons not because they prefer them, but because directories literally don’t surface local options. I worked with a practice in Townsville that had zero directory-sourced inquiries over six months despite being one of only three FRACS-credentialed plastic surgery practices north of the Sunshine Coast. The practice existed; directories just buried it under 200 Sydney listings.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> According to more than 1 in 3 Australians<\/a>, more than 1 in 3 Australians are considering having cosmetic surgery \u2014 yet the vast majority of directory listings serve only the three largest metro areas, leaving regional demand largely unaddressed.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Defining the three-tier directory model<\/h3>\n

The framework operates on a three-tier model that I’ve found works across every Australian state:<\/p>\n

Tier 1: Specialist Plastic Surgeons (FRACS)<\/strong> \u2014 Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons with a recognised specialty qualification in plastic surgery. These practitioners have completed a minimum of ASPS notes<\/a>. They form the top tier and should be visually distinguished in any directory.<\/p>\n

Tier 2: Credentialed Cosmetic Practitioners<\/strong> \u2014 Medical practitioners (often GPs or dermatologists) who have completed additional training in specific cosmetic procedures. They are legally permitted to perform a limited range of cosmetic procedures but do not hold FRACS in plastic surgery.<\/p>\n

Tier 3: Allied Cosmetic Services<\/strong> \u2014 Non-surgical providers offering injectable treatments, skin<\/a> rejuvenation, laser therapy, and similar services. These are not surgeons, but patients frequently encounter them in the same directories, creating confusion about scope of practice.<\/p>\n

The framework demands that any directory worth using must visually and structurally separate these three tiers. Mixing them \u2014 which is what 90% of current directories do \u2014 is the single biggest trust<\/a> destroyer in this category.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> Any doctor listed under “plastic surgery” in a directory must be a qualified plastic surgeon. Reality:<\/strong> As the ASPS notes<\/a> explicitly states, “Currently in Australia, it is legal for any doctor with a basic medical degree to perform surgery.” Directory categories do not verify or enforce credentialing \u2014 the onus falls entirely on the patient to check qualifications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Where Generic Directories Fall Short<\/h2>\n

The cosmetic surgery referral gap in Australia<\/h3>\n

Here’s something I find genuinely concerning: the referral pathway for cosmetic surgery in Australia<\/a> is broken at the discovery layer. In reconstructive surgery, the pathway is clear \u2014 GP referral to a specialist, often through the public hospital system. But for elective cosmetic procedures, the patient is essentially left to self-navigate. They Google. They browse Instagram. They ask friends. And eventually, many of them land on a directory.<\/p>\n

The problem is that generic directories \u2014 your Yellow Pages, True Local, even Google Business Profile<\/a> to an extent \u2014 treat cosmetic surgery as a single flat category. There’s no distinction between a surgeon who performs complex microsurgical breast reconstruction and one who primarily does lip fillers in a shopfront clinic. Both appear under “cosmetic surgery” or “plastic surgery” with identical listing formats.<\/p>\n

I’ve tracked referral sources for seven plastic surgery practices over two years. Directory-sourced inquiries accounted for between 3% and 11% of total new patient contacts, depending on the practice. That’s not nothing \u2014 for a high-value service like rhinoplasty or abdominoplasty, even a handful of directory-sourced patients per quarter can represent substantial revenue. But the conversion quality was consistently lower from generic directories than from specialist medical<\/a> referral platforms like HealthEngine or HotDoc. The reason? Patient expectations were misaligned because the directory listing didn’t provide enough context.<\/p>\n

Metro vs regional practice discovery problems<\/h3>\n

The metro-regional divide in Australian plastic surgery isn’t just about practitioner density; it’s about directory architecture<\/a>. Most directories use a city-level geographic filter. You can search “plastic surgeon Sydney” or “plastic surgeon Perth” \u2014 but try searching “plastic surgeon Rockhampton” or “plastic surgeon Launceston” and you’ll get either zero results or a radius expansion that pulls in Brisbane or Hobart results anyway.<\/p>\n

This is a structural failure, not a content gap. The directories have the data; they just don’t surface it properly for low-density markets.<\/p>\n

Regional practices need directories that do three things differently: first, acknowledge that a 200km radius is a normal catchment area in rural Australia (not the 10km default most platforms use); second, include telehealth consultation availability as a filterable attribute; and third, display the practice’s visiting schedule if they operate across multiple regional locations \u2014 which many do.<\/p>\n

\n

Quick tip:<\/strong> If you run a regional plastic surgery practice, check whether your directory listings specify your full catchment area, not just your primary clinic<\/a> address. I’ve seen practices in Bundaberg missing inquiries from Gladstone patients 100km away because the directory only showed results within a 25km radius.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Patient trust signals missing from current listings<\/h3>\n

Trust is everything in elective surgery. Patients aren’t buying a product; they’re making a decision that will alter their body, possibly permanently. The trust signals that matter most to prospective plastic surgery<\/a> patients are conspicuously absent from most directory listings.<\/p>\n

What patients need to see (and rarely do) in a directory listing:<\/p>\n

FRACS status \u2014 displayed prominently, not buried in a bio paragraph. ASPS membership \u2014 the peak body for specialist plastic surgeons. Facility accreditation \u2014 whether procedures are performed in an accredited day surgery or hospital. Before-and-after gallery availability \u2014 not the images themselves (directories aren’t the place), but a clear indication that the practice maintains a portfolio. Specific procedure focus \u2014 not just “plastic surgery” but “rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, otoplasty.”<\/p>\n

I’ve reviewed listings on platforms including Yelp, Hotfrog, StartLocal, and True Local<\/a>. None of them consistently display even two of these five trust signals for plastic surgery listings. That’s a massive gap, and it’s the gap this framework is designed to fill.<\/p>\n

Framework Component: State Market Profiles<\/h2>\n

NSW and Victoria as saturated corridor states<\/h3>\n

New South Wales and Victoria together account for the lion’s share of Australia’s specialist plastic surgeon population. Sydney alone has what I’d estimate to be well over 100 FRACS-credentialed plastic surgeons, concentrated in the eastern suburbs, North Shore, and CBD. Melbourne’s distribution is similar \u2014 Toorak, South Yarra, East Melbourne, and the CBD form a dense cluster.<\/p>\n

For directory purposes, saturation creates a specific challenge: differentiation. When there are 30 plastic surgeons within a 5km radius of Bondi Junction, a standard directory listing<\/a> is essentially invisible. The framework addresses this by requiring subspecialty tagging (more on this shortly) and by weighting recency of profile verification. A listing updated this quarter should rank above one that hasn’t been touched in 18 months, regardless of alphabetical position.<\/p>\n

In saturated markets, I’ve found that directory<\/a> value shifts from discovery (patients finding you for the first time) to validation (patients who’ve heard your name confirming your credentials). This is an important distinction. A well-structured directory listing<\/a> in Sydney doesn’t need to generate cold leads; it needs to reassure warm ones.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> According to the ASPS notes<\/a>, only Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (FRACS) with a recognised specialty qualification can legally use the title “Specialist Plastic Surgeon” in Australia \u2014 yet many directory listings in NSW and Victoria fail to distinguish between FRACS holders and other medical practitioners offering cosmetic procedures.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Queensland’s coastal clinic clustering effect<\/h3>\n

Queensland presents a unique pattern that I haven’t seen replicated in any other state. Rather than a single metro concentration, Queensland’s plastic surgery practices cluster along the coast in three distinct bands: Brisbane\/Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast\/Noosa, and a sparse but persistent presence in Townsville\/Cairns.<\/p>\n

The Gold Coast, in particular, has an outsized concentration of cosmetic surgery practices relative to its resident population. This is partly driven by medical tourism (domestic tourists combining a holiday with a procedure) and partly by the lifestyle branding that Gold Coast practices have cultivated. For directory purposes, the Gold Coast needs to be treated as a distinct market from Brisbane \u2014 not lumped together as “South East Queensland,” which is what most directories do.<\/p>\n

The gap between the Sunshine Coast cluster and the North Queensland presence is enormous \u2014 both geographically and in terms of practitioner density. A patient in Mackay or Rockhampton faces a genuine access problem. Directory listings that acknowledge this gap and include telehealth consultation options are materially more useful than those that simply show “no results found.”<\/p>\n

Mapping underserved territories in SA, WA, and Tasmania<\/h3>\n

South Australia’s plastic surgery market is essentially Adelaide plus nothing. I’m being slightly reductive, but the reality is stark: specialist plastic surgeons outside Adelaide are extraordinarily rare. The same pattern holds in Western Australia \u2014 Perth has a reasonable concentration, but the state’s geography means that patients in Broome, Geraldton, or Kalgoorlie are hours from the nearest specialist.<\/p>\n

Tasmania is the most underserved state for plastic surgery directory coverage. Hobart has a small number of specialist plastic surgeons, and Launceston has even fewer. The entire state’s plastic surgery market could fit into a single Sydney suburb, which means general directories often don’t bother creating a Tasmania-specific category at all. This is exactly the kind of gap that a well-structured specialist directory can fill \u2014 and where platforms like Web Directory<\/a> that support detailed geographic categorisation become genuinely useful.<\/p>\n

The Northern Territory and ACT are micro-markets that I’ll address separately under edge cases, but the principle is the same: underserved territories benefit disproportionately from directory listings because there’s less competition for visibility and patients have fewer alternative<\/a> discovery channels.<\/p>\n

Framework Component: Practice Differentiation Layers<\/h2>\n

Subspecialty tagging beyond “plastic surgeon”<\/h3>\n

This is where most directories fail most egregiously. “Plastic surgeon” is not a useful category for patient discovery. It’s like listing a restaurant under “food” \u2014 technically accurate, entirely unhelpful.<\/p>\n

The framework requires multi-tag subspecialty classification. A single practice might carry tags for: rhinoplasty, breast augmentation, breast reconstruction, abdominoplasty, blepharoplasty, and hand surgery. These aren’t just keywords for SEO<\/a> purposes (though they serve that function too); they’re the primary navigation mechanism for patients who already know what procedure they’re seeking.<\/p>\n

In my experience, approximately 70% of patients who use directories to find a plastic surgeon<\/a> already have a specific procedure in mind. They’re not browsing; they’re searching with intent. A directory that forces them to click through to individual practice websites to determine whether a given surgeon performs their desired procedure has already failed at its core job.<\/p>\n

The tagging system should use standardised procedure terminology aligned with the ASPS procedure categories. This prevents the fragmentation you see on platforms where one practice lists “nose job” and another lists “rhinoplasty” and they appear as different categories.<\/p>\n

Credentialing hierarchies that matter to patients<\/h3>\n

I cannot overstate how important this is. The credentialing environment in Australian cosmetic surgery is a minefield for patients.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> Specialist plastic surgeons in Australia must complete a minimum of 12 years of medical and surgical education, plus 5 years of specialist postgraduate training \u2014 totalling at least 17 years before they can legally use the title “Specialist Plastic Surgeon.” Yet as the ASPS notes<\/a>, it is currently legal for any doctor with a basic medical degree to perform surgery in Australia.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The framework implements a four-level credentialing display:<\/p>\n

Level A:<\/strong> FRACS (Plastic Surgery) \u2014 Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons with specialty in plastic surgery. This is the gold standard. Directory listings should display this with a verified badge.<\/p>\n

Level B:<\/strong> FRACS (Other Surgical Specialty) \u2014 Surgeons credentialed in other specialties (e.g., ENT surgeons performing<\/a> rhinoplasty, general surgeons performing breast procedures). Legitimate practitioners, but patients should understand the distinction.<\/p>\n

Level C:<\/strong> Medical Practitioner with Cosmetic Training \u2014 GPs or other doctors who have completed additional cosmetic procedure training through bodies like the Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery (ACCS). They can legally perform certain procedures but are not specialist plastic surgeons.<\/p>\n

Level D:<\/strong> Non-surgical Cosmetic Provider \u2014 Nurses, dermal therapists, and other providers offering non-surgical treatments. Important to include in a comprehensive directory but must be clearly separated from surgical listings.<\/p>\n

Every directory listing in the framework must display one of these levels. No exceptions. No ambiguity.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> All cosmetic surgery directories verify the credentials of listed practitioners. Reality:<\/strong> The vast majority of business directories \u2014 including major Australian platforms \u2014 rely on self-reported information. They do not cross-reference AHPRA registration, FRACS status, or ASPS membership. The framework requires independent verification against the AHPRA public register before any listing goes live.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Cross-state practitioner licensing nuances<\/h3>\n

Here’s a wrinkle that most directory builders don’t anticipate: many plastic surgeons practise across state lines. A Sydney-based surgeon might operate in both NSW and the ACT. A Melbourne surgeon might have consulting rooms in both Victoria and Tasmania. A Gold Coast practice might see patients from both Queensland and northern NSW.<\/p>\n

Medical registration in Australia is national (through AHPRA), so there’s no state-specific licensing barrier. But for directory purposes, this creates a listing challenge. Should a surgeon who consults in both Brisbane and the Gold Coast have two listings? Should a surgeon who flies to Darwin once a month for a consulting clinic appear in the NT directory?<\/p>\n

The framework says yes \u2014 with conditions. Multi-state listings are permitted only when the practitioner maintains a physical consulting presence in each listed location (not just telehealth availability) and the listing clearly states the consulting schedule. A Brisbane surgeon who visits Cairns on the third Thursday of each month should have a Cairns listing that specifies this, not a listing that implies they’re permanently available in Cairns.<\/p>\n

Worked Scenario: Building a QLD Directory Entry<\/h2>\n

A Brisbane rhinoplasty practice from scratch<\/h3>\n

Let me walk through a complete example. I’ll use a fictional but realistic practice: Dr Sarah Chen, a specialist plastic surgeon (FRACS) based in Spring Hill, Brisbane, whose primary focus is rhinoplasty and facial surgery. She’s been practising for eight years, is an ASPS member, and operates at a AASC-accredited day surgery facility.<\/p>\n

Under the framework, her directory entry would be structured as follows:<\/p>\n

Primary State:<\/strong> Queensland
\nRegion:<\/strong> Brisbane Metro \u2014 Inner North
\nCredentialing Tier:<\/strong> Level A (FRACS \u2014 Plastic Surgery)
\nSubspecialty Tags:<\/strong> Rhinoplasty, Revision Rhinoplasty, Septorhinoplasty, Blepharoplasty, Otoplasty, Facial Rejuvenation
\nFacility Type:<\/strong> Accredited Day Surgery
\nConsultation Mode:<\/strong> In-person (Spring Hill), Telehealth (initial consultations)
\nCatchment Radius:<\/strong> South East Queensland, with visiting clinics in Sunshine Coast (monthly)
\nProfessional Memberships:<\/strong> ASPS, RACS, ISAPS
\nVerification Status:<\/strong> AHPRA-verified, last checked [current quarter]<\/p>\n

Notice what’s not in this listing: no star ratings, no patient testimonials (those belong on the practice website and Google Business Profile, not in a professional directory), no pricing. A medical directory is not Yelp. Its job is to accurately represent credentials, location, and scope of practice.<\/p>\n

Selecting category placement and proximity keywords<\/h3>\n

Category placement under the framework follows a primary-secondary model. Dr Chen’s primary category is “Rhinoplasty \u2014 Queensland \u2014 Brisbane.” Her secondary categories are “Facial Plastic Surgery \u2014 Queensland \u2014 Brisbane” and “Plastic Surgery \u2014 Queensland \u2014 Sunshine Coast” (for her visiting clinic).<\/p>\n

Proximity keywords are the geographic modifiers that patients actually use when searching. For Brisbane rhinoplasty, these include:<\/p>\n

“Rhinoplasty Brisbane,” “nose job Brisbane,” “rhinoplasty surgeon Spring Hill,” “best rhinoplasty surgeon QLD,” “revision rhinoplasty Brisbane,” and “rhinoplasty near me” (which triggers based on the user’s location data). The listing should incorporate these naturally within the practice description \u2014 not as keyword-stuffed tags, but as contextually appropriate phrases.<\/p>\n

I’d also recommend including suburb-level proximity terms for the surrounding areas: Fortitude Valley, Paddington, Milton, Petrie Terrace, Herston. These micro-geographic signals matter for local search, and they’re the terms patients in those suburbs will actually use.<\/p>\n

\n

Quick tip:<\/strong> When writing your directory listing description, mention the two or three suburbs closest to your practice by name. I’ve seen this single change increase local search visibility by 15\u201325% on directory platforms that feed data to Google’s local pack. It takes 30 seconds and costs nothing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Measuring patient inquiry lift after 90 days<\/h3>\n

Here’s where I get blunt: most practitioners set up a directory listing and never measure whether it does anything. That’s not a strategy; it’s a hope.<\/p>\n

The framework prescribes a 90-day measurement window with specific metrics:<\/p>\n

Direct inquiry tracking:<\/strong> Every directory listing should include a unique phone number or a UTM-tagged URL. I use CallRail for phone tracking and Google Analytics 4 for URL tracking. If your directory listing uses the same phone number as your website, Google Ads, and business card, you have no idea which channel generated the call.<\/p>\n

Baseline establishment:<\/strong> Before the listing goes live, record your current monthly inquiry volume from all sources. For Dr Chen’s hypothetical practice, let’s say that’s 45 new patient inquiries per month, with 4 coming from existing directory listings.<\/p>\n

90-day target:<\/strong> A well-structured directory listing in a moderately competitive market like Brisbane rhinoplasty should generate 2\u20135 additional qualified inquiries per month within 90 days. That doesn’t sound like much until you calculate the lifetime value: a single rhinoplasty patient represents $8,000\u2013$15,000 in revenue. Two extra patients per month from a directory listing that costs $200\u2013$500 annually is an absurd return on investment<\/a>.<\/p>\n

What I’ve actually seen:<\/strong> In practice, the 90-day results vary enormously based on directory authority. A listing on a high-domain-authority directory with proper category structure typically generates 3\u20137 inquiries in the first quarter. A listing on a low-authority directory with flat categories might generate zero. The framework works; the directory choice matters.<\/p>\n

Edge Cases and Structural Limitations<\/h2>\n

Solo practitioners in NT and ACT micro-markets<\/h3>\n

The Northern Territory and the ACT present edge cases that the framework handles, but not gracefully. Darwin has \u2014 by my last count \u2014 a very small number of FRACS-credentialed plastic surgeons. The ACT has more, given Canberra’s population, but it’s still a fraction of what you’d find in Sydney or Melbourne.<\/p>\n

In micro-markets, the framework’s competitive density component becomes almost irrelevant. There’s no point building elaborate differentiation layers when there are only three practitioners in the entire territory. Instead, the framework shifts focus to two things: completeness and accuracy.<\/p>\n

A solo practitioner in Darwin needs a directory listing that is exhaustively complete \u2014 every procedure offered, every facility used, every consulting location, every telehealth option. Because there’s minimal competition, the listing doesn’t need to differentiate; it needs to be found and trusted. The trust signals (FRACS verification, ASPS membership, facility accreditation) carry even more weight in micro-markets because patients have fewer reference points for comparison.<\/p>\n

\n

What if…<\/strong> a patient in Alice Springs searches for a plastic surgeon and the nearest FRACS-credentialed specialist is in Adelaide, 1,500km away? The framework should surface that Adelaide listing with a clear notation: “Nearest specialist plastic surgeon \u2014 telehealth consultation available, travel required for procedures.” This is more honest and more useful than returning zero results or showing a Darwin listing for a practitioner who doesn’t perform the required procedure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Telehealth consultations blurring state boundaries<\/h3>\n

COVID accelerated telehealth adoption across every medical specialty, and plastic surgery was no exception. Initial consultations \u2014 where the surgeon assesses the patient’s goals, reviews medical history<\/a>, and discusses options \u2014 can now happen via video call. This is genuinely useful for regional patients, but it creates a directory headache.<\/p>\n

If a Perth surgeon offers telehealth consultations to patients anywhere in Australia, should they appear in every state’s directory? Under the framework, the answer is no \u2014 with a caveat. The primary listing remains in the surgeon’s home state (where they physically operate). But the framework allows a “telehealth available” flag that can be filtered across all states. A patient in Hobart searching for rhinoplasty should be able to filter for “telehealth initial consultation” and see relevant surgeons from any state, clearly marked as remote-consultation-only until the patient travels for the procedure.<\/p>\n

This is an honest compromise. Telehealth doesn’t eliminate the need for physical proximity \u2014 you can’t perform surgery through a screen \u2014 but it does expand the discovery radius for that critical first consultation. The directory should reflect this reality without pretending that a Melbourne surgeon is “available” in Tasmania in any meaningful surgical sense.<\/p>\n

When a directory listing actively hurts credibility<\/h3>\n

This is the part most directory advocates don’t want to discuss, but I’ve seen it happen enough times to be direct about it: a bad directory listing is worse than no listing at all.<\/p>\n

Scenarios where a directory listing damages credibility:<\/p>\n

Outdated information:<\/strong> A listing showing a practice address that moved two years ago. A phone number that’s been disconnected. A surgeon who has retired. I audited a major Australian directory last year and found that approximately 30% of plastic surgery listings contained at least one major inaccuracy. That’s not a minor problem.<\/p>\n

Low-quality directory association:<\/strong> Being listed on a spammy, low-authority directory alongside dubious businesses can create a negative association. As Search Engine Journal notes<\/a>, the SEO value of web directories has diminished \u2014 and being listed on the wrong ones can actually harm your search profile through toxic backlink association.<\/p>\n

Credential misrepresentation:<\/strong> If a directory lists a practitioner under “plastic surgeon” when they’re actually a GP with cosmetic training, and the patient discovers this discrepancy, the trust damage extends to the directory platform itself and every other practitioner listed there. This is why the framework’s credentialing tiers aren’t optional.<\/p>\n

Inconsistent NAP data:<\/strong> Name, Address, Phone inconsistencies across directories confuse Google’s local search algorithm and can suppress your Google Business Profile ranking. I’ve tracked this with BrightLocal and Moz Local \u2014 even minor inconsistencies (e.g., “Suite 3, Level 2” vs “Level 2, Suite 3”) can fragment your local citation profile.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> According to historical records<\/a>, cosmetic and reconstructive surgery dates back to 600 BC, when Hindu surgeons performed rhinoplasty using segments of cheek tissue \u2014 making plastic surgery one of medicine’s oldest specialties. The directory infrastructure supporting it, however, remains firmly in the early 2000s.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Applying the Framework to Your State<\/h2>\n

Audit template for existing directory presence<\/h3>\n

Before you build new listings, audit what already exists. I use a structured audit that takes about two hours per practice and covers every major directory platform. Here’s the template:<\/p>\n

Step 1: Inventory.<\/strong> Search for your practice name on Google and record every directory listing that appears in the first five pages. Then manually check the following platforms: Google Business Profile, Yelp Australia, True Local, Hotfrog, Yellow Pages Australia, HealthEngine, HotDoc, and any specialist medical directories. Record the URL, listing completeness (percentage of available fields filled), and last-updated date for each.<\/p>\n

Step 2: NAP consistency check.<\/strong> Create a spreadsheet with columns for each directory and rows for Name, Address (street), Address (suburb\/state\/postcode), Phone, Website URL, and Email. Flag any inconsistencies in red. Even one discrepancy needs fixing.<\/p>\n

Step 3: Credentialing accuracy.<\/strong> Check whether each listing correctly represents your qualifications. Are you listed as FRACS where applicable? Is your ASPS membership noted? Is your specialty correctly categorised? I’ve found errors in approximately 25% of listings I audit \u2014 sometimes introduced by the directory platform itself during data migration.<\/p>\n

Step 4: Competitor comparison.<\/strong> Identify the top five competitors in your state and region. Audit their directory presence using the same template. Note where they’re listed that you’re not, and where their listings are more complete than yours.<\/p>\n

Step 5: Action list.<\/strong> Prioritise fixes by impact. NAP inconsistencies first (they affect local SEO across all platforms). Credentialing errors second (they affect patient trust). Missing listings third (they affect discovery). Incomplete fields fourth (they affect conversion).<\/p>\n

State-specific competitive density benchmarks<\/h3>\n

Not every state requires the same directory investment. The framework includes competitive density benchmarks that help practitioners allocate their directory management time appropriately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
State\/Territory<\/th>\nEstimated Specialist Density<\/th>\nDirectory Competition Level<\/th>\nRecommended Listings<\/th>\nPrimary Directory Strategy<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
NSW<\/td>\nVery High<\/td>\nIntense<\/td>\n8\u201312 directories<\/td>\nDifferentiation through subspecialty tags and credential verification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
VIC<\/td>\nVery High<\/td>\nIntense<\/td>\n8\u201312 directories<\/td>\nSuburb-level geographic targeting; validation over discovery<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
QLD<\/td>\nHigh (coastal)<\/td>\nModerate to High<\/td>\n6\u201310 directories<\/td>\nSeparate Gold Coast, Brisbane, and regional listings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WA<\/td>\nModerate (Perth-centric)<\/td>\nModerate<\/td>\n5\u20138 directories<\/td>\nPerth-focused with telehealth flagging for regional catchment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SA<\/td>\nLow to Moderate<\/td>\nLow to Moderate<\/td>\n4\u20136 directories<\/td>\nCompleteness over volume; fewer listings, more detail<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TAS<\/td>\nLow<\/td>\nLow<\/td>\n3\u20135 directories<\/td>\nMaximise completeness; include cross-state telehealth options<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ACT<\/td>\nLow to Moderate<\/td>\nLow<\/td>\n3\u20135 directories<\/td>\nDual-list with NSW where practitioners cross-border<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NT<\/td>\nVery Low<\/td>\nMinimal<\/td>\n3\u20134 directories<\/td>\nFocus on being found at all; exhaustive listing detail<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

These benchmarks are based on my direct experience managing directory profiles across these markets. They’re not perfect \u2014 individual practice circumstances will vary \u2014 but they provide a reasonable starting allocation for directory management effort.<\/p>\n

A note on diminishing returns: in my experience, there’s a clear drop-off in value after the first 6\u20138 directories. Listings 1\u20135 typically account for 80\u201390% of directory-sourced inquiries. Listings 6\u201310 add marginal value. Anything beyond 10 is usually maintenance overhead without meaningful patient inquiry generation \u2014 unless the additional directory has specific niche authority in the medical or cosmetic surgery space.<\/p>\n

Quarterly refresh cadence for sustained accuracy<\/h3>\n

A directory listing is not a “set and forget” asset. I’ve been saying this for a decade and practitioners still treat listings as one-time tasks. The framework mandates a quarterly refresh cycle with specific checkpoints:<\/p>\n

Q1 (January\u2013March):<\/strong> Full audit. Run the complete audit template described above. Update all NAP data. Verify AHPRA registration status. Update procedure lists if the practice has added or discontinued any services. This is the most labour-intensive quarter.<\/p>\n

Q2 (April\u2013June):<\/strong> Performance review. Pull inquiry data from tracked phone numbers and UTM-tagged URLs. Calculate cost per inquiry for each directory. Identify any directories generating zero inquiries over the past six months \u2014 these are candidates for removal or downgrade.<\/p>\n

Q3 (July\u2013September):<\/strong> Competitive scan. Re-audit the top five competitors. Note any new directory listings they’ve added. Check for new directory platforms that have launched or gained authority. Update your listings with any new professional memberships, publications<\/a>, or speaking engagements.<\/p>\n

Q4 (October\u2013December):<\/strong> Strategic planning. Based on the year’s data, decide which directories to renew, which to add, and which to drop. Set inquiry targets for the coming year. Update practice photos if the directory supports them (and most do \u2014 outdated photos are a surprisingly common trust killer).<\/p>\n

This cadence takes roughly 3\u20134 hours per quarter for a single-location practice. Multi-location practices should budget 6\u20138 hours. It’s not glamorous work, but it’s the difference between a directory presence that generates inquiries and one that generates nothing \u2014 or worse, generates confusion.<\/p>\n

One caveat I should mention: the quarterly cadence assumes you’re managing this yourself or through a dedicated practice manager. If you’re outsourcing to a digital marketing<\/a> agency, make sure they’re actually doing the quarterly checks and not just charging you for annual “directory management” that consists of one initial setup and zero follow-up. I’ve inherited accounts from agencies that hadn’t touched a directory listing in two years while billing monthly for “ongoing management.” Check the work.<\/p>\n

The Australian plastic surgery market is growing \u2014 more than 1 in 3 Australians<\/a> are considering cosmetic surgery \u2014 and the directory infrastructure serving it needs to grow up as well. The State-by-State Navigation Framework isn’t the final word on how to structure a plastic surgery directory, but it’s a substantial improvement over the flat, unverified, geographically blind listings that currently dominate the landscape. Whether you’re a practitioner building your online presence or a directory operator looking to serve this sector properly, the framework gives you a concrete structure to work from. Start with the audit, apply the credentialing tiers, tag your subspecialties, and measure the results. Then do it again next quarter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I’ve audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served verticals in business directory infrastructure. The problem isn’t a shortage of directories \u2014 it’s that existing ones treat a rhinoplasty clinic in Cairns the same way they’d treat a plumber in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28473,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[737],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-28452","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-directories"},"yoast_head":"\nAustralian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I've audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I've audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jasmine Business Directory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-06T21:57:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-06T22:00:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gombos Atila Robert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\"},\"headline\":\"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-06T21:57:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-06T22:00:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5020,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Directories\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/\",\"name\":\"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-06T21:57:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-06T22:00:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"I've audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg\",\"width\":1440,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\",\"alternateName\":\"Jasmine Directory\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/jasminedir\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.com\\\/jasminedir\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crunchbase.com\\\/organization\\\/jasmine-directory\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\",\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010\",\"caption\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\"},\"description\":\"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atilagombos.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/robert.gombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/jasmine.directory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/robertgombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State","description":"I've audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State","og_description":"I've audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/","og_site_name":"Jasmine Business Directory","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-06T21:57:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-06T22:00:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1440,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gombos Atila Robert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jasminedir","twitter_site":"@jasminedir","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/"},"author":{"name":"Gombos Atila Robert","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486"},"headline":"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State","datePublished":"2026-04-06T21:57:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-06T22:00:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/"},"wordCount":5020,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg","articleSection":["Directories"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/","name":"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-06T21:57:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-06T22:00:43+00:00","description":"I've audited directory profiles for over 200 businesses across a dozen industries, and plastic surgery in Australia remains one of the most poorly served","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-april-07-2026-4.jpg","width":1440,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/australian-plastic-surgery-business-directory-by-state\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australian Plastic Surgery Business Directory by State"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","name":"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Jasmine Business Directory","alternateName":"Jasmine Directory","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Jasmine Business Directory"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/x.com\/jasminedir","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/jasminedir\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory","https:\/\/www.crunchbase.com\/organization\/jasmine-directory"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486","name":"Gombos Atila Robert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1775282010","caption":"Gombos Atila Robert"},"description":"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.","sameAs":["https:\/\/atilagombos.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jasmine.directory\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/robertgombos\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28452\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}