{"id":28441,"date":"2026-05-13T15:16:27","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T20:16:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?p=28441"},"modified":"2026-05-13T15:18:45","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T20:18:45","slug":"uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic"},"content":{"rendered":"

Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and a photograph of a building they’ve never visited. Some of them end up in the hands of genuinely skilled surgeons. Others end up in revision surgery within eighteen months. The difference between those two outcomes almost never comes down to luck \u2014 it comes down to how the patient selected their clinic in the first place.<\/p>\n

I’ve spent the better part of a decade helping cosmetic surgery<\/a> clinics build their digital presence, and in doing so, I’ve developed an uncomfortable familiarity with how little useful information most directory listings actually provide. This article introduces what I call the Clinic Match Framework<\/strong> \u2014 a structured, three-pillar methodology for evaluating UK<\/a> cosmetic surgery clinics that goes far beyond scrolling through listings and hoping for the best.<\/p>\n

The Clinic Match Framework Defined<\/h2>\n

Why browsing directories fails patients<\/h3>\n

The typical patient journey starts with a Google search: “cosmetic surgery clinic near me.” They land on a directory<\/a> \u2014 sometimes a general business directory, sometimes a healthcare-specific one \u2014 and they see a list. Each listing has a name, an address, maybe a phone number, possibly a star rating. If the directory is well-curated (like Web Directory<\/a>, which at least categorises healthcare providers with some editorial oversight), there might be a brief description. But even in the best case, the patient is making a decision about elective surgery based on the same information they’d use to pick a plumber.<\/p>\n

That’s the core problem. Directories<\/a> are designed to surface businesses, not to help patients make clinical decisions. They flatten the distinction between a surgeon who has performed 2,000 rhinoplasties and one who dabbles in nose jobs between breast augmentations. They treat a Harley Street address as equivalent to a purpose-built surgical facility in Birmingham. They cannot tell you whether a clinic’s CQC rating was “Good” or “Requires Improvement” \u2014 and most patients don’t think to check.<\/p>\n

I’ve audited over 200 business directory profiles for cosmetic surgery clinics<\/a> specifically. In roughly 60% of cases, the information was either incomplete, outdated, or misleading in at least one material respect. That’s not a minor gap. That’s a systemic failure in how patients find surgical care.<\/p>\n

Three pillars of informed clinic selection<\/h3>\n

The Clinic Match Framework rests on three pillars, applied sequentially:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Pillar<\/th>\nWhat It Assesses<\/th>\nPrimary Data Sources<\/th>\nEliminates What % of Listings<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1. Regulatory Verification<\/strong><\/td>\nLegal compliance, registration status, inspection outcomes<\/td>\nCQC, GMC, BAAPS\/BAPRAS membership<\/td>\n25\u201340%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2. Procedural Match<\/strong><\/td>\nSurgeon volume, specialisation match, portfolio quality<\/td>\nSurgeon CVs, clinic<\/a> websites, published case volumes<\/td>\n30\u201350%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3. Patient Experience Signals<\/strong><\/td>\nComplaint patterns, aftercare quality, consultation conduct<\/td>\nTrustpilot, NHS reviews, CQC complaints, RealSelf<\/td>\n10\u201320%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Applied in sequence, these three pillars typically reduce a list of 40\u201350 clinics to 3\u20135 credible options. That’s a manageable shortlist for in-person consultations. The framework doesn’t tell you which clinic is “best” \u2014 it tells you which clinics deserve your time and money to evaluate further.<\/p>\n

How UK regulatory environment shapes the model<\/h3>\n

The UK occupies an odd position in cosmetic surgery regulation. On one hand, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspects and rates clinics<\/a> that perform surgical procedures. On the other, there’s no legal requirement for a doctor performing<\/a> cosmetic surgery to be on the GMC’s Specialist Register for plastic surgery. A GP with a weekend course can legally inject dermal fillers. A surgeon whose specialty is orthopaedics can, in theory, offer facelifts.<\/p>\n

This regulatory patchwork is precisely why a framework matters. In countries with tighter scope-of-practice laws (France<\/a>, for instance), the directory listing itself carries more implicit credibility because the regulatory barrier to entry is higher. In the UK, the burden of verification falls disproportionately on the patient. The Clinic Match Framework is designed to carry that burden systematically.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> According to at 7.28% CAGR<\/a>, the global cosmetic surgery market is projected to grow from USD 102.49 billion in 2026 to USD 133.52 billion by 2031, at a 5.43% CAGR. That growth means more clinics entering the market each year \u2014 and more listings for patients<\/a> to sift through without adequate tools.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Where Standard Directory Listings Fall Short<\/h2>\n

Vague credentials and missing CQC data<\/h3>\n

I pulled 50 cosmetic surgery listings from five major UK business directories<\/a> last year and checked each one against the CQC register and GMC database. Here’s what I found:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Directory Feature<\/th>\nPresent in Listing<\/th>\nAccurate When Present<\/th>\nPatient Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
CQC registration number<\/td>\n12%<\/td>\n83%<\/td>\nPatients cannot verify inspection status<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Named surgeon(s)<\/td>\n38%<\/td>\n71%<\/td>\nNo way to check GMC register<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Specialist registration status<\/td>\n6%<\/td>\n100%<\/td>\nVirtually invisible to directory users<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Procedure list<\/td>\n64%<\/td>\n89%<\/td>\nMisleading breadth suggests competence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Last updated date<\/td>\n22%<\/td>\nN\/A<\/td>\nStale listings persist for years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The most alarming number there is 6% for specialist registration status. That means 94% of directory listings give you no indication whether the surgeon operating on your face is actually a specialist in plastic surgery<\/a> or someone who pivoted from a different discipline. In a market where Grand View Research projects<\/a> the cosmetic surgery sector will reach $195.87 billion globally by 2033, the commercial incentive to list on directories is enormous \u2014 and the informational quality hasn’t kept pace.<\/p>\n

The star-rating illusion in cosmetic surgery<\/h3>\n
\n

Myth:<\/strong> A clinic with a 4.8-star rating on Google or a directory is safer and more competent than one with 4.2 stars. Reality:<\/strong> Star ratings in cosmetic surgery correlate more strongly with front-desk friendliness, clinic<\/a> d\u00e9cor, and post-procedure euphoria than with surgical outcomes. Complications from cosmetic surgery often manifest weeks or months after the procedure \u2014 long after most patients have left their review. I’ve seen clinics with 4.9-star averages that had active CQC enforcement actions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Star ratings are useful for restaurants. They’re dangerous for surgery. A bad meal gives you indigestion; a bad rhinoplasty gives you breathing difficulties for life. The feedback loops are completely different, and aggregating them into the same five-star scale creates a false equivalence that directories have no interest in correcting (because higher ratings drive<\/a> more clicks).<\/p>\n

What “consultation available” actually hides<\/h3>\n

Nearly every cosmetic surgery listing includes some variant of “free consultation available” or “book your consultation today.” This sounds patient-friendly. In practice, it often masks a sales pipeline designed to convert enquiries into bookings as quickly as possible.<\/p>\n

A proper cosmetic surgery consultation \u2014 one that complies with the spirit of the RCS Professional Standards for Cosmetic Surgery \u2014 should include a cooling-off period of at least two weeks between consultation and surgery. It should involve a face-to-face meeting with the operating surgeon (not just a “patient coordinator”). It should include a detailed discussion of risks, alternatives, and realistic outcomes.<\/p>\n

The phrase “consultation available” on a directory tells you none of this. It doesn’t tell you whether the consultation is with the surgeon or a sales representative. It doesn’t tell you whether there’s a cooling-off period or whether you’ll be offered a finance package before you’ve had time to think. In my experience, about one in three “free consultations” at cosmetic surgery clinics are essentially sales meetings with a clinical veneer.<\/p>\n

Pillar One: Regulatory Verification Layer<\/h2>\n

Cross-referencing CQC inspection outcomes<\/h3>\n

The CQC website (cqc.org.uk) is free, public, and searchable. Every clinic in England that performs regulated surgical activities must be registered. The CQC rates clinics across five domains: safe, effective, caring, responsive, and well-led. Each domain gets an individual rating, and there’s an overall rating.<\/p>\n

Here’s the step-by-step process I use:<\/p>\n

First, take the clinic name from the directory listing and search for it on the CQC register. If it doesn’t appear, that’s either because it operates in Scotland or Wales (where different regulators apply \u2014 Healthcare Improvement Scotland and Healthcare Inspectorate Wales, respectively), or because it isn’t registered. If it’s an English clinic and it’s not on the CQC register, stop. Do not book a consultation. Do not pass go.<\/p>\n

Second, check the inspection date. CQC inspections aren’t annual \u2014 they’re risk-based. A clinic last inspected in 2019 might have changed ownership, surgeons, or clinical protocols since then. Recent inspections (within the last two years) carry more weight.<\/p>\n

Third, read the actual inspection report, not just the rating. I’ve seen “Good”-rated clinics where the report flagged concerns about consent processes that were judged not severe enough to downgrade the overall rating. The detail matters more than the headline.<\/p>\n

\n

Quick tip:<\/strong> When searching the CQC register, use the clinic’s registered company name, not its trading name. Many cosmetic surgery clinics<\/a> operate under a brand name that differs from the legal entity registered with the CQC. If the directory listing doesn’t include the registered name, that’s itself a minor red flag.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

GMC specialist register confirmation steps<\/h3>\n

The General Medical<\/a> Council maintains a public register of all licensed doctors in the UK. More importantly for cosmetic surgery, it maintains a Specialist Register<\/strong> \u2014 a separate list of doctors who have completed approved specialist training<\/a> programmes.<\/p>\n

For cosmetic surgery, you’re looking for surgeons<\/a> on the Specialist Register in one of these categories: Plastic Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (for facial procedures), or Otolaryngology (for rhinoplasty specifically). A surgeon who is on the GMC register but not<\/em> on the Specialist Register may be perfectly competent \u2014 but you have no institutional verification of their surgical training.<\/p>\n

The GMC’s online tool takes about 30 seconds to use. Enter the surgeon’s name, check their registration status, check whether they’re on the Specialist Register, and note their specialty. If a directory listing doesn’t name the surgeon, you can’t perform this check \u2014 which is precisely why 62% of directory listings that omit surgeon names should be treated with suspicion until the information is obtained directly.<\/p>\n

Spotting lapsed registrations before booking<\/h3>\n

Registrations lapse. It happens more often than you’d think. A surgeon might let their GMC registration lapse during a career break, a period of ill health<\/a>, or \u2014 more concerning \u2014 following a fitness-to-practise investigation. The GMC register shows current status, including any conditions or restrictions on practice.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> If a surgeon’s name appears on a clinic’s website, they must be currently registered and practising. Reality:<\/strong> Clinic websites are marketing<\/a> materials, not regulatory documents. I’ve encountered at least four instances in the past three years where a clinic’s website listed a surgeon who was no longer registered with the GMC or who had conditions on their registration that the website didn’t disclose. Always verify independently.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

CQC registrations can also lapse or be suspended. If a clinic was registered when the directory listing was created but has since had its registration cancelled, the directory listing may persist for months or years. Directories are not real-time databases<\/a> \u2014 they’re snapshots that degrade over time.<\/p>\n

Pillar Two: Procedural Alignment Scoring<\/h2>\n

Matching your specific procedure to surgeon volume<\/h3>\n

This is where the framework gets detailed. A clinic that “offers rhinoplasty” is not the same as a clinic where the lead surgeon performs 150 rhinoplasties a year. Volume matters in surgery \u2014 the evidence on this is extensive and unambiguous. Higher-volume surgeons have lower complication rates, shorter operating times, and better aesthetic outcomes.<\/p>\n

The problem is that surgeon volume data isn’t published in any standardised way in the UK. You have to extract it. Here’s how:<\/p>\n

Check the surgeon’s profile on the clinic website for any mention of case numbers. Check their profile on BAAPS (British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons) if they’re a member. Search for published papers or conference presentations \u2014 surgeons who present case series at conferences typically mention their volume. And if none of that works, ask directly during the consultation. A surgeon who won’t tell you how many times they’ve performed your specific procedure is a surgeon you should not use.<\/p>\n

I assign a simple scoring system: fewer than 50 lifetime cases of your specific procedure gets a score of 1; 50\u2013200 gets a 2; 200\u2013500 gets a 3; over 500 gets a 4. This isn’t scientific \u2014 it’s a heuristic. But it separates the occasional practitioners from the dedicated specialists more reliably than any directory star rating.<\/p>\n

Distinguishing generalist clinics from niche specialists<\/h3>\n

The UK cosmetic surgery market has a structural tension between generalist clinics and niche specialists. Generalist clinics \u2014 the large chains like Transform (now part of the MYA group) and similar operations \u2014 offer everything from Botox to body contouring. Niche specialists focus on one or two procedure categories: a rhinoplasty-only practice, a breast surgery specialist, an oculoplastic surgeon who does nothing but eyelid and brow work.<\/p>\n

\n

Did you know?<\/strong> According to at 7.28% CAGR<\/a>, a 300% surge in GLP-1 weight-loss prescriptions (drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy) is generating major new demand for body contouring and skin tightening procedures. This means generalist clinics are rushing to add post-weight-loss body contouring to their menus \u2014 often before they’ve built deep knowledge in the procedures.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Neither model is inherently better. But for complex procedures \u2014 rhinoplasty, facial feminisation, revisional breast surgery \u2014 niche specialists consistently produce better outcomes in my observation. For straightforward procedures like liposuction of a single area or standard breast augmentation, a well-run generalist clinic with high volume can be perfectly appropriate.<\/p>\n

Directory listings almost never make this distinction. A generalist clinic listing 27 procedures looks more impressive than a specialist listing three. The framework inverts this: a narrower procedure list, combined with high volume in your specific procedure, scores higher than a broad menu with unknown volume per procedure.<\/p>\n

Reading before-and-after portfolios with clinical eyes<\/h3>\n

Every cosmetic surgery clinic website has a before-and-after gallery. Most patients look at these galleries<\/a> and think “that looks good” or “that doesn’t look good.” That’s a start, but it’s not enough.<\/p>\n

Here’s what to look for:<\/p>\n

Consistency of photography conditions.<\/strong> Are the before and after photos taken with the same lighting<\/a>, same angle, same distance? If the “before” photo is taken under harsh fluorescent light and the “after” is taken with soft, flattering studio lighting, the comparison is meaningless. Reputable clinics standardise their photography setup.<\/p>\n

Volume of cases shown.<\/strong> A gallery with five rhinoplasty results could mean the surgeon has done five rhinoplasties, or it could mean they’ve done 500 but only show the best five. Ask how many total cases they’ve performed relative to the number shown. A surgeon showing 50 cases out of 300 is being more transparent than one showing 5 out of 50.<\/p>\n

Diversity of starting points.<\/strong> A surgeon who shows only “easy” cases \u2014 minor refinements on already-attractive faces \u2014 is curating for marketing impact. Look for cases that started with major asymmetry, previous surgical damage, or complex anatomy. How a surgeon handles difficult cases tells you far more than how they handle straightforward ones.<\/p>\n

Time since surgery.<\/strong> Results at three months look different from results at twelve months. Swelling subsides, scars mature, tissues settle. If every “after” photo is labelled “6 weeks post-op,” you’re seeing an incomplete picture. The best portfolios show results at multiple time points.<\/p>\n

Pillar Three: Patient Experience Signals<\/h2>\n

Decoding complaint histories on NHS and Trustpilot<\/h3>\n

Reviews are noisy data. But patterns in noisy data are signal.<\/p>\n

I use a specific approach: ignore the overall star rating entirely and instead search for keywords that indicate systemic problems. On Trustpilot, I search the clinic’s reviews for terms like “aftercare,” “complication,” “ignored,” “refund,” “pressure,” and “rushed.” On the CQC website, I check whether any formal complaints have been recorded in inspection reports. On RealSelf (which has a UK section), I look for detailed narrative reviews rather than one-line endorsements.<\/p>\n

One negative review about a rude receptionist is noise. Five reviews mentioning difficulty reaching the clinic after surgery is a pattern. Three reviews describing feeling pressured to book during the consultation is a red flag. The absolute number of complaints matters less than the thematic clustering.<\/p>\n

\n

What if…<\/strong> you find a clinic with overwhelmingly positive reviews but a CQC rating of “Requires Improvement”? This happens more often than you’d expect. The explanation is usually that patients review the experience (friendly staff, nice building, visible results) while the CQC inspects the systems (record-keeping, consent documentation, emergency protocols). A clinic can provide a pleasant patient experience while having inadequate clinical governance. In this scenario, the CQC rating should take precedence \u2014 you want both, but if forced to choose, systems safety trumps customer satisfaction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Aftercare provisions as a quality proxy<\/h3>\n

Aftercare is the single most reliable proxy for clinic quality that doesn’t require regulatory data or surgical training to evaluate. Good aftercare is expensive to provide \u2014 it requires staffing, availability, and a genuine commitment to patient welfare that extends beyond the point of revenue collection.<\/p>\n

Here’s what adequate aftercare looks like for a surgical procedure:<\/p>\n

A named point of contact (not a generic phone line) available for the first 72 hours post-surgery. At least two scheduled follow-up appointments included in the surgical fee. A clear protocol for emergency contact outside business hours. Written aftercare instructions specific to the procedure performed. And \u2014 this is the one most clinics skip \u2014 follow-up at six months and twelve months post-surgery to assess long-term outcomes.<\/p>\n

If a clinic’s directory listing or website mentions “comprehensive aftercare” without specifying what that includes, treat it as marketing copy until proven otherwise. During your consultation, ask for the aftercare protocol in writing. A clinic that can hand you a printed aftercare schedule has thought about this. A clinic that says “we’ll be in touch” has not.<\/p>\n

Red flags in consultation pressure tactics<\/h3>\n

The consultation is your final filter, and it’s where the framework meets reality. Certain behaviours during a consultation should immediately disqualify a clinic from your shortlist:<\/p>\n

Same-day booking offers.<\/strong> “We have a cancellation next week \u2014 we can fit you in if you decide today.” This violates the cooling-off principle and suggests the clinic prioritises throughput over patient welfare.<\/p>\n

Finance discussions before clinical assessment.<\/strong> If the conversation turns to payment plans before the surgeon has examined you and discussed whether you’re a suitable candidate, the clinic’s priorities are misaligned.<\/p>\n

Consultation with a non-surgeon.<\/strong> Meeting a “patient coordinator” or “aesthetic consultant” instead of the operating surgeon is common at chain clinics. It’s not illegal, but it means the person assessing your suitability has a sales incentive, not a clinical one.<\/p>\n

Discouragement of second opinions.<\/strong> Any surgeon who reacts negatively to you mentioning that you’re consulting with other clinics is telling you something important about their confidence in their own offering.<\/p>\n

\n

Myth:<\/strong> A free consultation means the clinic is confident and generous. Reality:<\/strong> Free consultations are a marketing tactic. The cost of the consultation is built into the surgical fee. Clinics that charge for consultations (typically \u00a350\u2013\u00a3200, often deductible from the surgical fee if you proceed) tend to attract more serious enquiries and face less pressure to “convert” every consultation into a booking. I’m not saying free consultations are inherently bad \u2014 but the economic incentive structure is worth understanding.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Full Walkthrough: Choosing a Rhinoplasty Clinic in Manchester<\/h2>\n

Applying all three pillars step by step<\/h3>\n

Let me walk through a real scenario \u2014 anonymised, but based on an actual case I assisted with in 2023. A 34-year-old woman (I’ll call her Sarah) wanted a rhinoplasty to address a dorsal hump and mild asymmetry. She lived in Manchester and preferred a clinic within an hour’s drive. She had a budget of \u00a36,000\u2013\u00a38,000.<\/p>\n

Sarah started where most patients start: Google. Her search returned a mix of organic results, paid ads, and directory listings. Between Google Maps, NHS Choices, Trustpilot, RealSelf, and two general business directories, she compiled an initial list of 47 clinics or individual surgeons<\/strong> offering rhinoplasty within her geographic range.<\/p>\n

Forty-seven options. That’s paralysing. Here’s how the framework reduced it.<\/p>\n

Narrowing from forty-seven listings to three<\/h3>\n

Pillar One: Regulatory Verification.<\/strong> Sarah checked each of the 47 against the CQC register. Eleven were not CQC-registered (some were non-surgical aesthetic clinics that had been miscategorised in directories; two appeared to be operating without registration). Three had a CQC rating of “Requires Improvement.” She eliminated all 14. She then checked the named surgeons (where available \u2014 only 19 of the remaining 33 listings named a surgeon) against the GMC Specialist Register. Of those 19, 14 were on the Specialist Register for Plastic Surgery or Otolaryngology. Five were not \u2014 they were on the general register but not specialist-listed. She moved the five non-specialist-registered surgeons to a “maybe” pile (not eliminated, but flagged) and eliminated the 14 listings that didn’t name a surgeon at all, reasoning that if a clinic won’t tell you who’s operating, you shouldn’t have to guess.<\/p>\n

After Pillar One: 14 clinics remaining, plus 5 in the “maybe” pile.<\/p>\n

Pillar Two: Procedural Alignment.<\/strong> Sarah visited each of the 14 clinic websites and assessed rhinoplasty-specific content. She was looking for: dedicated rhinoplasty pages (not just a bullet point on a procedure list), before-and-after galleries with at least 10 rhinoplasty cases, and any indication of surgeon volume. Seven clinics had dedicated rhinoplasty content with substantial portfolios. Four had minimal rhinoplasty content (suggesting it wasn’t a focus area). Three had extensive content but the photography was inconsistent \u2014 different lighting, angles, and time points that made comparison impossible.<\/p>\n

She scored the seven strong candidates on her procedural alignment criteria. Two surgeons had published rhinoplasty case series in peer-reviewed journals (a strong signal of both volume and training). One had presented at the BAAPS annual meeting on rhinoplasty techniques. The remaining four had solid portfolios but less verifiable volume data.<\/p>\n

After Pillar Two: 7 clinics remaining, with 3 clear frontrunners.<\/p>\n

Pillar Three: Patient Experience Signals.<\/strong> Sarah reviewed Trustpilot, Google Reviews, and RealSelf for all seven clinics. She used my keyword search method \u2014 looking specifically for “aftercare,” “complication,” “pressure,” and “rushed.” Two of the seven had complaint clusters around aftercare (multiple reviews mentioning difficulty reaching the clinic post-surgery). One had a pattern of reviews mentioning pressure to book during the consultation. She eliminated these three.<\/p>\n

She then called each of the remaining four clinics to ask about aftercare protocols. Three provided detailed answers; one was vague (“we look after all our patients really well”). She dropped the vague one.<\/p>\n

After Pillar Three: 3 clinics remaining.<\/p>\n

The final decision and what tipped the balance<\/h3>\n

Sarah booked consultations with all three. Two charged a consultation fee (\u00a3150 and \u00a3100, both deductible from the surgical fee); one offered a free consultation. All three consultations were with the operating surgeon \u2014 a non-negotiable requirement by this stage.<\/p>\n

The final decision came down to factors the framework intentionally doesn’t prescribe: personal rapport with the surgeon, the clarity of the surgical plan presented, and the realism of the expected outcome. One surgeon showed Sarah a computer simulation of her likely result that she felt was overly optimistic. Another presented a range of possible outcomes \u2014 best case, likely case, and limitations. The third was clinically excellent but had a manner Sarah found cold and difficult to communicate with.<\/p>\n

She chose the surgeon who presented the range of outcomes. The procedure was performed four months later (the wait time itself was a positive signal \u2014 busy surgeons have waiting lists). At twelve-month follow-up, she was satisfied with the result.<\/p>\n

Total cost: \u00a37,200 including consultation fee, surgery, and all follow-up appointments. Total time spent on research using the framework: approximately six hours spread over two weeks. That’s six hours to make a decision she’ll live with for the rest of her life. It seems like a reasonable investment<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n

Quick tip:<\/strong> Keep a spreadsheet as you work through the framework. Columns for clinic name, CQC status, GMC specialist registration, procedure volume (if available), portfolio quality score (1\u20134), review keyword flags, and aftercare protocol clarity. It sounds bureaucratic, but when you’re comparing seven clinics from memory, details blur. A spreadsheet doesn’t forget.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Edge Cases and Honest Limitations<\/h2>\n

Harley Street address versus actual operating facility<\/h3>\n

This is one of the most persistent deceptions in UK cosmetic surgery marketing, and directories are complicit in it. A clinic lists a Harley Street address. The patient assumes this is where their surgery will take place \u2014 in a prestigious, purpose-built medical facility in central London. In reality, the Harley Street address is a consultation room (sometimes a shared office rented by the hour), and the actual surgery takes place at a hospital or surgical facility elsewhere \u2014 sometimes in a completely different city.<\/p>\n

I’ve seen this with at least a dozen clinics. The directory listing shows W1G. The surgery happens in Borehamwood. There’s nothing illegal about this \u2014 the consultation genuinely takes place at the listed address. But it’s misleading, and it means the CQC registration you should be checking is for the operating facility<\/em>, not the consultation address.<\/p>\n

The framework handles this by requiring patients to ask a specific question during the consultation: “Where exactly will my surgery be performed, and what is the CQC registration number for that facility?” If the answer is a different location from the one listed in the directory, verify the operating facility independently.<\/p>\n

When the framework struggles with newer clinics<\/h3>\n

I’ll be honest about a major limitation. The Clinic Match Framework is biased toward established clinics. A new clinic \u2014 say, one that opened eight months ago \u2014 will have limited CQC inspection history<\/a> (possibly only a registration inspection, not a full rated inspection), a small review base, and surgeons whose volume at that specific clinic is necessarily low (even if their career volume is high).<\/p>\n

This means genuinely excellent new clinics can score poorly on the framework, while mediocre established clinics with long histories and large review bases can score adequately. I don’t have a clean solution for this. The best workaround is to weight the surgeon’s career history more heavily than the clinic’s history when dealing with a new facility. A surgeon with 20 years on the Specialist Register who opens a new clinic is a different proposition from a new clinic with surgeons you can’t trace.<\/p>\n

The consolidation trend in the market \u2014 at 7.28% CAGR<\/a> that multi-specialty clinic chains are consolidating through scale advantages in marketing and procurement \u2014 means new independent clinics face an uphill battle for visibility. Some of the best surgeons I’ve encountered work at small, recently established practices that barely register on directories. The framework can miss them. That’s a real limitation, and I’d rather state it plainly than pretend it doesn’t exist.<\/p>\n

Cosmetic tourism and cross-border verification gaps<\/h3>\n

The framework was designed for UK-based clinics regulated by UK bodies. It does not translate well to cosmetic tourism \u2014 surgery performed abroad, typically in Turkey<\/a>, Poland, or Lithuania, at significantly lower prices.<\/p>\n

I’m not going to pretend cosmetic tourism is always a bad decision. There are excellent surgeons in Istanbul who perform more rhinoplasties in a month than most UK surgeons perform in a year. But the verification infrastructure doesn’t exist in the same way. Turkish clinics aren’t on the CQC register. Turkish surgeons aren’t on the GMC Specialist Register. Turkish review platforms have different norms and sometimes different integrity standards than Trustpilot or Google.<\/p>\n

If you’re considering cosmetic tourism, the framework’s Pillar One (regulatory verification) needs to be adapted to the destination country’s regulatory system \u2014 which requires research specific to that country. Pillar Two (procedural alignment) still applies, and arguably matters even more when you can’t easily return for revision surgery. Pillar Three (patient experience signals) is harder to apply because review platforms vary by country and language.<\/p>\n

The honest assessment: the framework works well for UK clinics, partially for clinics in EU countries with comparable regulatory systems, and poorly for clinics in countries where regulatory transparency is limited. If you’re going abroad for surgery, you need a different (and more intensive) due diligence process than this framework provides.<\/p>\n

There’s also the aftercare gap. If a complication arises after you’ve flown home, who manages it? Your NHS GP is not obligated to provide aftercare for elective cosmetic surgery performed abroad (though many will, pragmatically). The operating surgeon is in another country. This aftercare gap is, in my view, the single strongest argument against cosmetic tourism for complex surgical procedures \u2014 stronger even than the regulatory verification challenges.<\/p>\n

The cosmetic surgery market is growing fast. Grand View Research projects<\/a> a 10.09% annual growth rate through 2033, with the market reaching $195.87 billion globally. Non-surgical procedures are growing even faster \u2014 at 7.28% CAGR<\/a> versus slower growth for surgical procedures. More clinics, more listings, more noise. Social media is lowering psychological barriers to first-time treatment uptake, particularly among younger consumers who, as Mordor Intelligence notes, increasingly regard injectables as preventive care rather than corrective medicine<\/a>.<\/p>\n

All of this means the problem the Clinic Match Framework addresses is getting worse, not better. More clinics means more directory listings. More listings means more noise. More noise means patients need better filters \u2014 not just more information, but structured<\/em> information applied in the right sequence.<\/p>\n

The framework isn’t perfect. It’s biased toward established clinics. It doesn’t handle cross-border verification well. It requires about six hours of research that most patients would rather not do. But it reduces a paralysing list of 40+ options to a manageable shortlist of 3\u20135, and it does so using publicly available data that anyone with internet<\/a> access can check. In a market where starting a cosmetic surgery practice<\/a> requires considerable operational effort but relatively few clinical barriers to entry, that kind of structured patient-side verification isn’t optional \u2014 it’s vital.<\/p>\n

Print the framework. Build the spreadsheet. Do the six hours. Your future self \u2014 the one living with the results \u2014 will be grateful you did.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and a photograph of a building they’ve never visited. Some of them end up in the hands of genuinely skilled surgeons. Others end up in revision surgery within eighteen months. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28947,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[728],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-28441","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business"},"yoast_head":"\nUK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jasmine Business Directory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-13T20:16:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-13T20:18:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gombos Atila Robert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@jasminedir\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\"},\"headline\":\"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-13T20:16:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-13T20:18:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4904,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Business\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/\",\"name\":\"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-13T20:16:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-13T20:18:45+00:00\",\"description\":\"Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\",\"alternateName\":\"Jasmine Directory\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Jasmine Business Directory\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/jasminedir\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/jasminedirectory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.com\\\/jasminedir\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crunchbase.com\\\/organization\\\/jasmine-directory\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486\",\"name\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1778307301\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1778307301\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.jasminedirectory.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1778307301\",\"caption\":\"Gombos Atila Robert\"},\"description\":\"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/atilagombos.com\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/robert.gombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/jasmine.directory\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/robertgombos\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Jasmine_Directory\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic","description":"Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic","og_description":"Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/","og_site_name":"Jasmine Business Directory","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","article_published_time":"2026-05-13T20:16:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-13T20:18:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gombos Atila Robert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jasminedir","twitter_site":"@jasminedir","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/"},"author":{"name":"Gombos Atila Robert","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486"},"headline":"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic","datePublished":"2026-05-13T20:16:27+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-13T20:18:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/"},"wordCount":4904,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg","articleSection":["Business"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/","name":"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-13T20:16:27+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-13T20:18:45+00:00","description":"Every year, I watch roughly 15,000 people in the UK book cosmetic surgery consultations based on nothing more than a directory listing, a star rating, and","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Business-directory-06-190.jpg","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/uk-cosmetic-surgery-business-directory-find-a-clinic\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UK Cosmetic Surgery Business Directory \u2013 Find a Clinic"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","name":"Jasmine's Business Directory Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Jasmine Business Directory","alternateName":"Jasmine Directory","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Jasmine-directory-logo-official.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Jasmine Business Directory"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/x.com\/jasminedir","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/jasminedirectory\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/jasminedir\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory","https:\/\/www.crunchbase.com\/organization\/jasmine-directory"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/088f91f4a09b0333a72c29560bcb6486","name":"Gombos Atila Robert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1778307301","url":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1778307301","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/cfc93b692b3469fdbcf2be9b45c0355e.jpg?ver=1778307301","caption":"Gombos Atila Robert"},"description":"Gombos Atila Robert brings over 15 years of specialized experience in marketing, particularly within the software and Internet sectors. His academic background is equally robust, as he holds Bachelor\u2019s and Master\u2019s degrees in relevant fields, along with a Doctorate in Visual Arts.","sameAs":["https:\/\/atilagombos.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/robert.gombos\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jasmine.directory\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/robertgombos\/","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jasmine_Directory"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28441\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasminedirectory.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}